On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 8:12 AM wrote:
> On 2024-12-17 13:27:48, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> > Hello world :-)
> >
> > Recent PR #2893 [1] proposed using "select" statement for "PIPES" as
> > dependency of "LIBUV" option. There is a preference to use "depends
> > on" in that case [2]. What are your pref
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 2:12 PM wrote:
> On 2024-12-17 13:27:48, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> > Hello world :-)
> >
> > Recent PR #2893 [1] proposed using "select" statement for "PIPES" as
> > dependency of "LIBUV" option. There is a preference to use "depends
> > on" in that case [2]. What are your prefe
On 2024-12-17 13:27:48, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Hello world :-)
>
> Recent PR #2893 [1] proposed using "select" statement for "PIPES" as
> dependency of "LIBUV" option. There is a preference to use "depends
> on" in that case [2]. What are your preferences and experiences in
> this area? Is there a p
Hi Tomek,
I preffer "select" instead of "depends on"
I dont remember having a policy yet but I think that we should be
consistent and replace all occurences then document the project agreed way.
Best regards
Alin
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, 21:35 Tomek CEDRO, wrote:
> Hello world :-)
>
> Recent PR #289
Hello world :-)
Recent PR #2893 [1] proposed using "select" statement for "PIPES" as
dependency of "LIBUV" option. There is a preference to use "depends
on" in that case [2]. What are your preferences and experiences in
this area? Is there a policy / preference in this area for NuttX? :-)
What ar
