RE: Intertask communication in NuttX

2022-12-17 Thread David Sidrane
Have you looked at uOrb? -Original Message- From: Roberto Bucher Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2022 1:53 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Intertask communication in NuttX Hi after successfully reached to recompile the microROS environment, I'd like to build an inte

Re: Intertask communication in NuttX

2022-12-17 Thread Gregory Nutt
I think that I can't use a shared memory with my embedded system (nucleo-144), because I can't see the CONFIG_BUILD_KERNEL=y in my .config file. You can use "shared memory" in other build modes too.  The APIs to management shared memory don't exist in other build modes because they are use

Re: Intertask communication in NuttX

2022-12-17 Thread Roberto Bucher
Thanks! Good idea! Roberto On 12/17/22 10:50, Mark Stevens wrote: Options I would consider would be Message queues Pipes For the project I am involved in we use both of these but mainly use message queues. Message queues should only be used for small messages, I think the limit is about 22

Re: Intertask communication in NuttX

2022-12-17 Thread Mark Stevens
Options I would consider would be Message queues Pipes For the project I am involved in we use both of these but mainly use message queues. Message queues should only be used for small messages, I think the limit is about 22 bytes. I get around this by creating the large message and passing

Intertask communication in NuttX

2022-12-16 Thread Roberto Bucher
Hi after successfully reached to recompile the microROS environment, I'd like to build an intertask communication between a microROS node and a pysimCoder generated code. I think that I can't use a shared memory with my embedded system (nucleo-144), because I can't see the CONFIG_BUILD_KERNE