Re: Expected behavior of SMART FS

2021-08-25 Thread Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza
Just to update and close this conversation with a better understanding of my problem and providing solution: I basically had 2 problems: 1. When calling *smart_initialize() *and *nx_mount()* , I had "no low level format" error. To fix that, I needed to force format using the following command: *m

Re: Expected behavior of SMART FS

2021-08-09 Thread Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza
Hi Ken, Thank you. I'll appreciate to know the results of your tests. I am also performing more tests than this one and I am experiencing issues that I still don't know if it is related to SMART FS, or some NuttX module or even the chip I am using. The issues are intermittent, what makes it harder

Re: Expected behavior of SMART FS

2021-08-06 Thread Ken Pettit
Hi Sara, I'm not sure SmartFS was ever tested with this particular sequence where the volume is erase and then re-mounted to a different location. If I get a chance this weekend, I will take a look at it since you have a very specific test sequence. Ken On 8/5/21 3:48 PM, Sara da Cunha Mon

Expected behavior of SMART FS

2021-08-05 Thread Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza
Hi all, I am facing some issues when enabling SMART FS and I'd like to know if this is an expected behavior or maybe a bug on NuttX. First issue: - If I use the following sequence: 1. smart_initialize() 2. nx_mount() nx_mount throws errors like: sector not allocated and no low level format. To fi