Re: 12.1.0 vs 12.1

thanks for spotting the error Best Regards Alin On Thu, 11 May 2023, 03:52 Tomek CEDRO, wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:42 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2023, 6:34 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote: > > > Silly question.. why some places use release name 12.1.0 (i.e. running > > > firmware)

Re: 12.1.0 vs 12.1

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 3:42 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2023, 6:34 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote: > > Silly question.. why some places use release name 12.1.0 (i.e. running > > firmware) and some other places use 12.1? > > Shouldn't we stick to one coherent versioning convention? 12.1.0? > >

Re: 12.1.0 vs 12.1

On Wed, May 10, 2023, 6:34 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote: > Silly question.. why some places use release name 12.1.0 (i.e. running > firmware) and some other places use 12.1? > > Shouldn't we stick to one coherent versioning convention? 12.1.0? Since becoming an Apache project all releases have used the

12.1.0 vs 12.1

Silly question.. why some places use release name 12.1.0 (i.e. running firmware) and some other places use 12.1? Shouldn't we stick to one coherent versioning convention? 12.1.0? :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info