Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

Hi, it's been 72 hours since the vote start with 7 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. I think we can close the vote now and I'll mark the pull request as ready. Thanks. Michal On 4/29/25 08:37, Michal Lenc wrote: > Hi all, > > I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

+1 from me Thanks, On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 2:39 AM Michal Lenc wrote: > Hi all, > > I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to > the one expected by POSIX standard > . The description of the > change is provided in the ma

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

+1 On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 3:38 AM Michal Lenc wrote: > Hi all, > > I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to > the one expected by POSIX standard > . The description of the > change is provided in the mailing list, to su

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

pril 29, 2025 2:38 PM > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard > > Thank you Michal, good catch! :-) > > +1 from me :-) > > I just wonder how to communicate the change to folks that may use > existing functionality and

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

+1 from here as well. POSIX compliance should take precedence over everything else including introduction of regressions. -Ville From: Tomek CEDRO Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 2:38 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

Thank you Michal, good catch! :-) +1 from me :-) I just wonder how to communicate the change to folks that may use existing functionality and what would be the proposed fix to get the same behavior after update (i.e. send logs to /dev/null) :-) Tomek On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 8:39 AM Michal Lenc

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

+1 from me On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 8:53 AM Matteo Golin wrote: > +1 from me! > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, 2:38 AM Michal Lenc wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to > > the one expected by POSIX standard > >

Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

+1 from me! On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, 2:38 AM Michal Lenc wrote: > Hi all, > > I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to > the one expected by POSIX standard > . The description of the > change is provided in the mailing list

[VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

Hi all, I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to the one expected by POSIX standard . The description of the change is provided in the mailing list, to summarize it, our implementation uses zero argument to set logging mas