Thanks for gregory and xiang.
yes... the right way is modified the error handling code in
nsh_catfile not fwrite. I will repaired it again.
BR,
wei peng
Xiang Xiao 于2019年12月24日周二 上午9:58写道：
> Hi Peng,
> From http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cstdio/fwrite/
> fwrite return zero to indicate the e
Hi Peng,
>From http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cstdio/fwrite/
fwrite return zero to indicate the error, the detailed info could get
from errno.
So the right change is modified the error handling code in
nsh_catfile, not the return type of fwrite.
Thanks
Xiang
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 9:48 AM we
see the size_t is unsigned cannot be negative. that is the problem.
i think if the terminal is close,the "size_t fwrite()"function should
return a negative number,and the nsh_catfile should be broken.
That is not the way that fwrite returns errors. If an error occurs
fwrite returns fewer ite
hi David,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes...i know the interface interface is standard,so what i had changed in
codes just repaired the problem.perhaps i should describe the problem in
detail.
I entering "dmesg" on both terminals，because of the “CONFIG_IOB_DEBUG” is
enable so both of terminals will
Hi wei peng
See below.
On 2019/12/23 07:41:40, wei peng wrote:
> hi~
> I connected the target board to terminal via "telnet" , in some cases
> the terminal will be frozen. Here are detailed steps:
>
>1. Enable "CONFIG_IOB_DEBUG"[necessary].
>2. New two terminals and connect to targe
hi~
I connected the target board to terminal via "telnet" , in some cases
the terminal will be frozen. Here are detailed steps:
1. Enable "CONFIG_IOB_DEBUG"[necessary].
2. New two terminals and connect to target board via "telnet".
3. Input "dmesg" command,and the terminal will show in
Forwarded Message
Subject:[nuttx] [PATCH] doubt about fwrite
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 18:30:04 -0800 (PST)
From: wei peng
Reply-To: nu...@googlegroups.com
To: NuttX
hi~
I connected the target board to terminal via "telnet" , in some cases
th
