Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-11 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Simon, That was my initial idea, but we have different needs, I comment about existing standards that I checked: https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx_hardware/blob/main/Documentation/standard/index.rst Sparkfun MicroMod was promising for a standard simple connector, but soon I realized it doesn't e

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Simon Filgis
Hi Alan, What about copying known standards. Like Phytec SOM, Toradex, Kontron. That would attract market shares. Need to fill your list with my boards and start testing. It's in the backlog for too long. Simon -- Hard- and Softwaredevelopment Consultant Geschäftsführung: Simon Filgis USt-IdNr

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Nathan, I like your suggested organization, but I don't like the idea of including it under Apache, because it is not an Apache project, even the license is different, note it is Creative Common 0. Maybe we should select a better hardware license but I didn't see it in the Github combobox opti

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Simon, The idea is not to limit users choice, but have standard connector with known pinouts to test different microcontrollers. For people who develop tailored hardware it will be very useful because you can develop an internal baseboard to test some ideas and just exchance the MCU module to

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Simon Filgis
I don't like the term standard hardware. Maybe because I create tailored hardware for a living. I love Nuttx for the flexibility. Please do not limit choice of hardware. -- Hard- and Softwaredevelopment Consultant Geschäftsführung: Simon Filgis USt-IdNr.: DE305343278 ISO9001:2015

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Nathan Hartman
Hi all, I have a few suggestions:: 1. I suggest to request INFRA to create a new repository for the design and implementation of hardware, which initially will contain the NuttX Standard Board hardware. I suggest the name nuttx-hardware. 2. Within the nuttx-hardware repository, I suggest to have

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Tomek, Thank you for those nice suggestions. 1) Yes, even some companies like Freescale (now NXP) used that idea in the past, i.e. DEMOQE board: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/DEMOQE128UM.pdf The MCU module boards need to have a minimum size to fit the connector and also we need to thi

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Aaah! NuttX BaseBoard is more self-exlpanatory thanks Alan! :-) I played like this in the 1990's with 8051 but instead having one single board I created separate modules that were attached with 2.54 wires and f/m-connectors this allowed me to reuse different modules with different boards and appli

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-10 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Tomek, The idea is to have a baseboard that could be used with different MCU modules, similar to Mikroe Fusion ARM: https://www.mikroe.com/fusion-for-arm But in our case the MCU modules are not limited only to ARM. We could use any MCU currently supported by NuttX, because the common signals (

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-09 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Ah, so this idea is in fact about reference hardware :-) Thanks Matteo for your great work on documentation! :-) Tomek On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 12:13 AM Matteo Golin wrote: > > Hey Tomek, > > I added a template for new boards here actually: > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16405 > > I agre

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-09 Thread Matteo Golin
Hey Tomek, I added a template for new boards here actually: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16405 I agree about the STM32 docs though, I'd like to help tackle those once the legacy READMEs are ported and the application docs are closer to being filled out. Matteo On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, 5:22 

Re: [OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-09 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Thanks Alan :-) It would be nice to have a template for new boards along with documentation, and maybe update existing boards when some standard is ready :-) https://github.com/acassis/nuttx_board_std - I get 404 here o_O I have question here, when looking at STM32 mcus/boards these seem to have

[OT] NuttX Standard Board

2025-06-09 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Everyone, To implement the item 11 of the actions to improve NuttX: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16278 I requested ChatGPT to list the most common signals/interfaces existent on NuttX: https://chatgpt.com/share/6841d483-5400-8012-ada6-b962d215f410 So I created a project to Document a