s are working as expected?
BR,
Alan
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 11:14 AM Serg Podtynnyi
wrote:
Hi, I am still researching the sched problem on my config
Found this macro code from last September, looks like pre vs prev
typo, right?
#definedq_insert_mid(pre,mid,next)\
do\
{\
mid->flink =next;\
mi
/24/25 15:06, hujun260 wrote:
The lockcount can be understood as a local variable, so no race conditions will
occur.
编辑
分享
At 2025-04-24 15:54:48, "Serg Podtynnyi" wrote:
Hi, I tried my best to understand the logic behind unlock and
merge_pending routines and come up with t
s a local variable, so no race conditions
>will occur.
>编辑
>分享
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 2025-04-24 15:54:48, "Serg Podtynnyi" wrote:
>>Hi, I tried my best to understand the logic behind unlock and
&
nothing to do with the race condition, and since the rtcb is this_task, it
will only be modified by one CPU.As for why your modification can
solve the problem, I haven't figured it out yet. Can you further analyze the reasons for
the failure to boot?
At 2025-04-22 13:25:13, "Serg Podtynnyi&qu
count ?
PS
It's almost 11 years since I last touched NuttX - it's a please to work
with it again.
From 86fa0a65fdd37804154faf3db52e2826281cdfbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serg Podtynnyi
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:37:48 +0700
Subject: sched: update lock/unlock critical se
