level, the function
declarations up_enable_irq() and up_disable_irq() are excluded from the
compilation.
This results in "implicit declaration" warning for RX65N
Regards,
Anjana
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
Thank you for the confirmation
Regards,
Anjana
From: Brennan Ashton
Sent: 11 September 2020 23:16
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query on USB Hub device node creation
**This is an external email. Please check the
.
There will be no entry available in /dev directory for the USB Hub device.
Is my understanding correct?
Is this the expected behaviour of NuttX?
Regards,
Anjana
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for
class,
is removed correctly upon disconnection)
Has anyone faced similar issue ?
Any inputs to resolve the issue will be helpful
Regards,
Anjana
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the ind
ly not defined, only fopen, fflush is defined.
So, I think when the compiler tries to map the symbols generated in symtab.c,
are looked for
Regards,
Anjana
From: Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES)
Sent: 18 June 2020 12:01
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: ELF Appl
**This is an external email. Please check the sender’s full email address (not
just the sender name) and exercise caution before you respond or click any
embedded link/attachment.**
Hi Anjana,
Did you add some flags (i.e. CELFFLAGS
.g_elf_exports+0x74):
undefined reference to `_pthread_join'
.
.
The above error is obtained for all the symbols generated in symtab.c from
mksymtab.sh.
Has anyone faced any similar issue?
Any help to resolve the issue would be really helpful.
Regards,
Anjana
?
Regards,
Anjana
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this message , or if this
message has been
riodic interrupt will behave like alarm interrupt.
So, alarminfo->active = false; should not be used in rtc_periodic_callback()
Please confirm
Regards,
Anjana
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for t
I confirm to subscribe to NuttX Apache mailing list
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this mes
10 matches
Mail list logo