Re: [VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

+1 from me! On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, 2:38 AM Michal Lenc wrote: > Hi all, > > I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to > the one expected by POSIX standard > . The description of the > change is provided in the mailing list

[VOTE] Change setlogmask behavior to POSIX standard

Hi all, I've submitted pull request that changes setlogmask function behavior to the one expected by POSIX standard . The description of the change is provided in the mailing list, to summarize it, our implementation uses zero argument to set logging mas

Re: RP2040 multiple GPIO interrupts

Hello everyone, In order to solve this issue, I have opened a PR here: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16281 This allows multiple GPIO interrupt types to be selected once, since the RP2040 supports that. Now one GPIO pin can trigger up to 4 interrupt events. I would appreciate your review!

Re: Setlogmask behavior not in compliance with POSIX

Thank you Michal good catch! :-) As this is breaking change for NuttX and may change existing applications/projects, but aligns with POSIX, please start a vote on the mailing list, and if the votes approve we can merge it :-) Until then please switch PR to Draft mode. Thanks! :-) Also if current

Setlogmask behavior not in compliance with POSIX

Hi all, just bringing the attention to the mailing list as well. I have submitted a pull request that fixes the behavior of setlogmask function. POSIX standard states passing zero mask as an argument should not modify the current logging mask and just return it. However, our NuttX implementat

Re: [RFC] How to improve NuttX quality and reliability

I just create an Issue listing the actions: Actions list to improve NuttX quality and reliability https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16278 I don't know if this is the right place, but at least I broke down the actions and it could be easier to update it individually. BR, Alan On Sun, Apr 2

Re: RFC - AVR fixes and support for AVR DA/DB family

Hi KR, What avr-gcc version are you using? I'm getting this error: "avr-gcc: error: device-specs/specs-avr128da28: No such file or directory" I found a reference to it here: https://www.avrfreaks.net/s/topic/a5C3l00UlWyEAK/t193338 I downloaded the Microchip.AVR-Dx_DFP.2.7.321.atpack file re

Re: Documentation tags for boards

Hi Kevin, Right now I'm not sure that it's possible to attach test logs to tags. I will look into it. It would certainly be nice to see verified tests for boards for each NuttX release. It might be possible to add those tags like "Tested: v12.3", and then include information in the documentation a

Re: Documentation tags for boards

Hey, I support this idea of tagging experimental and tested boards. This is exactly what I'm looking for. I hope this also motivates people to pick up their old boards and test them for NuttX. --- Some ideas --- Do these tags also contain metadata? Such as test logs? Test method? Because anythin