Looks like a promising feature.
Thanks Matteo for proposing this feature!
Best regards
Alin
Från: Tomek CEDRO
Skickat: den 27 april 2025 22:49
Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Ämne: Re: Documentation tags for boards
Very cool start Matteo! Builds and works fine for
Hi Nathan,
Great suggestion! I will add it!
We didn't investigate the root cause yet, but two weeks ago everything was
working fine.
We will investigate and find the offending commit
BR,
Alan
On Sunday, April 27, 2025, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> I like all of these ideas and would like to add:
Good idea Matteo!
We are glad for all these work you have done for NuttX!
BR,
Alan
On Sunday, April 27, 2025, Matteo Golin wrote:
> I quite like these ideas! I've just finished school for the year and have
> more free time on my hands to help NuttX. Earlier I emailed about tags for
> boards t
Thank you Vinicius!
All help is welcome!
Maybe you need to do a checklist of what a board needs to be considered
"complete" port and "stable".
We can use the TAGs that Matteo just created to identify a board as
stable/complete, that information could appear in the documentation and
when the user
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 7:10 PM Kevin Witteveen wrote:
> (..)
> === Affected systems ===
>
> --- RP2040 ---
> I experienced my first problems with the RP2040 recently. I am unable to
> get it to work reliably on a clean NuttX install with standard
> configurations. Sometimes the great test ‘ostest
Very cool start Matteo! Builds and works fine for me :-)
Would it be possible to rename "Site Tags" to just "Tags"? :-)
Thank you :-)
Tomek
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 8:51 PM Matteo Golin wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I opened a PR here to test out using tags in our docs:
> https://github.com/apa
I like all of these ideas and would like to add:
* static analysis can find simple mistakes that might have been introduced.
Things like a function that forgot to return a value in some code path, or
use of uninitialized variable, can be caught by static analysis.
By the way, did some recent chang
Hello everyone,
I opened a PR here to test out using tags in our docs:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16275
Please leave your feedback!
For now, I've included three types of tags:
- Chip tags to indicate what chip a board uses
- Peripheral tags to indicate supported peripherals (WiFi, Ether
I quite like these ideas! I've just finished school for the year and have
more free time on my hands to help NuttX. Earlier I emailed about tags for
boards to help identify peripherals and chips used, it seemed to be
accepted well. I will start working on that and include a "stable" tag to
use for
Hi, @Alan, as I'm far from being an expert on Nuttx I cannot help in such
deep topics. Nevertheless I would like to contribute with the documentation
for beginners. In addition I do agree on keeping, kind of, two directories.
One for the reliable ports and another one for the experimental ports. Fo
Dear NuttXers,
In the last weeks we are seeing some degradation of NuttX reliability as
some users have reported.
We saw it happening yesterday during our Live video: the fb command behaved
in some very strange ways:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbq3suU3g5g&t=1740s
First it printed all the re
Hi,
thanks for the response and for the PR on GitHub.
Ok. If possible, could you explain the issue with github?
Well, it's a personal thing. Aside from the usual gripe about big
corporation there is also a clause in their Terms of Service that
requires the user to "agree to submit to the ex
12 matches
Mail list logo
