On 11/8/2024 1:41 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
have you decided that targets w/o 64-bit integers are not good enough
reason to diverge from what the latest posix says about time_t?
are we effectively dropping those targets?
Anything that has a GCC port should have int64_t. For other cases, it
Hi Wang Bowen,
Thanks for sending me the updated files.
I think I found the problem with the move/rename. When porting to 6.6.23 I had
to adapt the assignment of 'struct renamedata rd' since the struct got changed
in commit abf0857.
Previously I only updated 'rd.old_mnt_userns = &init_user_ns;'
Hi Andre,
Sorry for late reply.
About your questions:
1. Your small fixes in Linux Rpmsg FS is right or not?
Yes, your fix is right and we will update our internal version.
2. Any updates in our internal rpmsgfs and rpmsgtty?
Actually, only some minor updates:
- We changed the rpmsg_fs an
