Dear NuttXers,
Talking about NuttX promotion, I just discovered that a Spanish company
released a PLC with NuttX support:
https://www.industrialshields.com/blog/arduino-industrial-1/first-steps-with-apache-nuttx-rtos-and-esp32-plc-571
Please "start spreading the NuttX" in your social networks ;-
Hi Christopher,
How are you doing? I hope you are fine.
I was looking at the "Related projects" page and noticed there is no
reference to Apache NuttX RTOS.
As you know, NuttX has supported littlefs since 2019-01-09.
Could you please include us in your listing? :-)
Thank you very much in advan
I used a "tutorial" / documentation last month to include a PNG image in
the LVGL and the code was mainly done.
The only issue I faced was that the converted PNG to C file page generated
a code with LVGL v8 information about RGB format.
After fixing that everything worked like a charm.
BR,
Alan
Actually at LVGL I don't think that we have too many tutorials. What we
have are
- ready to use projects for many IDEs and several dev boards to easily get
started
- many simple, short and targeted examples that can be tested by calling
functions like lv_example_chart_7()
- some complex demos to ha
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:36 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
> Thank you very much Gábor, I think having some nice tutorials like you have
> for LVGL will help many people!
>
> Something that people always asked me to do in the NuttX Channel videos was
> create some real file application examples.
On th
Thank you very much Gábor, I think having some nice tutorials like you have
for LVGL will help many people!
Something that people always asked me to do in the NuttX Channel videos was
create some real file application examples.
I was more focused on showing NuttX features, but after getting the
p
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:42 AM wrote:
> On 2024-07-09 09:21:32, Gregory Nutt wrote:
(snip)
> Sweeping generalizations generally don't work for all initialization
> cases.
>
> I only meant to use init to replace boardctl initializations but I see your
> point. Well, my point still stands for m
On 2024-07-09 20:12:49, Gábor Kiss-Vámosi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are two more points that I'd add:
> 1. Easy to get started: have example projects that can be set up by reading
> a few lines from the README.
Exactly. THE most important thing in project such as this is user friendly.
Once the simpl
Hi,
There are two more points that I'd add:
1. Easy to get started: have example projects that can be set up by reading
a few lines from the README.
2. Easy to move forward: by reading a few extra sentences the user should
know how to customize the project by adding new files, trying new features,
Another important thing the AI didn't say: YouTube!!!
YouTube is another great way to let more people discover about NuttX.
There is a nice YouTube channel called Robots5 using NuttX and PySimCoder,
please subscribe and help to share it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFeQVtbyKyQ
BR,
Alan
ht
That should be in the documentation and also further to my thoughts about
the NuttX website, this should be distilled to the essence and mentioned
right on the landing page, so people won't have to search through a lot of
unfamiliar documentation to find it.
Cheers
Nathan
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1
Hi Michal
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 12:08 PM wrote:
> On 2024-07-09 09:49:16, Alan C. Assis wrote:
> > I think many people outside our community have a misconception about
> NuttX:
> > They think it is a Linux/Unix RTOS that needs to have a shell integrated
> > into it.
> >
> > Note that all boards
Hi all,
in my opinion nsh provides a good familiar feeling for people coming from
Linux and may be missleading for many developers that come from bare
metal.
I think that we should improve the documentation and list all available
options with benefits and drawbacks for each option.
Best regards
Hi,
I agree on a lot of things with Michal (while I can't comment on other
things), being almost a beginner to the project (and embedded systems in
general) I think my viewpoint can help. Because of the coverage of nsh
across videos and documentation, I never knew for sure if nsh was a
requirement
Replies inline below:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM wrote:
> On 2024-07-09 09:49:16, Alan C. Assis wrote:
(snip)
> Suggestions about how to proceed to archive it are welcome.
> > Probably we will need collective help to archive it for all boards.
>
> Other problem I've seen is bad (or rathe
On 2024-07-09 09:21:32, Gregory Nutt wrote:
> On 7/9/2024 9:10 AM, michal.lyszc...@bofc.pl wrote:
> > I am just copy pasting my message from other thread, as I did not see
> > that one in time :) So my proposition is:
> >
> > I think I would be good if nuttx had something like /sbin/init that woul
Erf sorry, I messup with my email client...
BR,
--
Philippe
Le 9 juil. 2024 à 16:30, "Alan C. Assis" a écrit :Sorry
Nathan,
Actually it was Philippe that replied to the incorrect thread :-)
BR,
Alan
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:29 AM Alan C. Assis wrote:
> Thank you for this great feedback
On 2024-07-09 17:20:26, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> On 09/07/2024 17:06, michal.lyszc...@bofc.pl wrote:
> > I think I would be good if nuttx had something like /sbin/init that would
> > do some very simple service management. Then you could just tick
> > "Start NSH after boot up".
>
> I think you c
On 7/9/2024 9:10 AM, michal.lyszc...@bofc.pl wrote:
I am just copy pasting my message from other thread, as I did not see
that one in time :) So my proposition is:
I think I would be good if nuttx had something like /sbin/init that would
do some very simple service management. Then you could jus
Hi,
On 09/07/2024 17:06, michal.lyszc...@bofc.pl wrote:
I think I would be good if nuttx had something like /sbin/init that would
do some very simple service management. Then you could just tick
"Start NSH after boot up".
I think you can already do this by writing an init app and using that to
On 2024-07-09 10:06:53, Alan C. Assis wrote:
> How can we improve things?
>
> How can we simplify this?
I am just copy pasting my message from other thread, as I did not see
that one in time :) So my proposition is:
I think I would be good if nuttx had something like /sbin/init that would
do some
On 2024-07-09 09:49:16, Alan C. Assis wrote:
> I think many people outside our community have a misconception about NuttX:
> They think it is a Linux/Unix RTOS that needs to have a shell integrated
> into it.
>
> Note that all boards are required to have a "nsh" board profile, it was a
> suggestion
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:08 AM Philippe Leduc
wrote:
> For the record, we had a hard time understanding why NSH is a VIP citizen
> and that there are multiple ways of initializing NuttX (
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10821).
> I agree that the documentation is lacking on this subject
Sorry Nathan,
Actually it was Philippe that replied to the incorrect thread :-)
BR,
Alan
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:29 AM Alan C. Assis wrote:
> Thank you for this great feedback Philippe, but I think it should be at
> other thread:
>
> How to improve/simplify NuttX initialization processes?
>
Thank you for this great feedback Philippe, but I think it should be at
other thread:
How to improve/simplify NuttX initialization processes?
I think Nathan replied to incorrect thread.
Please move the discussion to the right thread.
BR,
Alan
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:08 AM Philippe Leduc
wr
For the record, we had a hard time understanding why NSH is a VIP citizen and
that there are multiple ways of initializing NuttX
(https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10821).
I agree that the documentation is lacking on this subject, but I still feel
that NSH shall be see as a standard userspa
Thank you Lup for the excellent explanation! Always informative and a
pleasure to read.
Good luck with the next 6 weeks of GSoC and thanks very much for your
efforts.
Nathan
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:29 PM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote:
> Hi All: I'm very sorry for the delay. Let me explain what Rushabh
Documentation needs to explicitly have two sections:
* NuttX without a shell (booting directly into your custom firmware
application)
* NuttX with a shell: booting into NSH
Within NuttX with a shell, we should explain:
* Purpose of NSH:
* Example of how to program and use many OS features
*
Hi Everyone,
I decided to bring it from here:https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12641
to improve our discussion.
Historically NuttX has many initialization options and not a unified
initialization process.
NSH for example has its own and exclusive NSH ARCH INIT (because naturally
it has more t
Dear NuttXers,
I think many people outside our community have a misconception about NuttX:
They think it is a Linux/Unix RTOS that needs to have a shell integrated
into it.
Note that all boards are required to have a "nsh" board profile, it was a
suggestion/requirement to confirm that the system
30 matches
Mail list logo
