Hi Greg,
I've added a comment about `syncfs` in the issue you mentioned. Thanks for
pointing out the issue list. I'm looking into adding VFS documentation now,
and after that I'll look into this.
Thanks and Regards,
SP
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:03 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > However, I think
However, I think it is a mistake to put the hooks in for syncfs and
not implement syncfs for other file systems that need it. From what
you say, syncfs() would be a no-op for those other file systems which
is (usually) wrong. Perhaps they could just call fsync() from
sync()? Doing nothing
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:49 AM yfliu2008 wrote:
> Dear Xiang and Bowen,
>
>
>
>
> Hope you've had a pleasant spring festival.
>
>
>
>
> As for RPTUN, I have it basically work using share memory only,
> though not very efficient but it has less hardware dependencies. I even can
> mount master's
I have no idea what is going on with syncfs. There have been some
recent changes:
Documentation/ReleaseNotes/NuttX-12.1.0:*
[#8092](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/8092) fs: Map syncfs to
fsync
Documentation/ReleaseNotes/NuttX-12.3.0:*
[#10764](https://github.com/apache/nutt
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the info! Can you tell me the reason why none of the existing
file systems in NuttX implement it?
Regards,
SP
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:27 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> It implementes the syncfs file system interface:
> https://linux.die.net/man/2/syncfs
>
> On 2/14/2024 8:16 AM
