I ordered a new board, to have more time testing at home and to rules out
hw error...
Thank you for the effort!!
Roberto Bucher schrieb am Fr., 9. Feb.
2024, 19:50:
> Tested on NUCLEO-H743ZI2 board with
>
> ./tools/configure.sh nucleo-h743zi2:pysim
>
> My PC has WIFI and the nucleo board connec
Tested on NUCLEO-H743ZI2 board with
./tools/configure.sh nucleo-h743zi2:pysim
My PC has WIFI and the nucleo board connected to the WIFI box
bucher@debian:~/sviluppo/NUTTX/nuttx$ tio /dev/ttyACM0
[18:58:30.631] tio v2.7
[18:58:30.631] Press ctrl-t q to quit
[18:58:30.631] Connected
telnetd [5:10
Hi,
Not sure I'm going to wait24Q3 :-) I'm certainly not focussed enough :-)
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/13632
Let's see what they think.
The only real issue is "how to build a micropython port that links to a
static lib" :)
And maybe how to avoid duplicating mbedtls a
Dear all,
I'm back at the board (NUCLEO-H743ZI2). Using latest master (with
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/commit/31817335e453eec65e8f5d1163c32efd5da373cb)
and pysim config is stable.
But I am not able to ping. I tried the following setups:
PC <-> Nucleo-Board
PC <-> Switch <-> Nucleo-Board
*He
Yes exactly, I was also thinking to make MicroPython a NuttX
application, just like we have Python on desktop, so it builds out of
the box and provides generic access no matter what arch/board, no
hardcoded hardware specific stuff, all hardware interaction done
though /dev :-)
I am switching from
Hi,
I found the deletion commit:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/commit/abcb66cb20d85b910d55854de51b197eaa468e8b
I think it should not work like that today.
Also, it looks like it does not come with micropython libraries...
We should contribute anything required in micropython itself so
Hi,
This would be no problem I think, as our potential usage is a stm32h7
board running a 400 MHz with 2 megs of ram.
We already have a product structure made of separate small services and
a message bus, so timing critical stuff, which is quite frozen (protocol
handlers etc) could stay in C
Hey there Sebastien :-)
NuttX is so well organized that writing bare C here is far more
efficient "rapid prototyping" so I had no more need to use MicoPython
as it turned out memory hungry for bigger applications.
But still I am fan of Python so we could resurrect the idea :-)
Tomek
--
CeDeROM,
Hi,
I think I may like to have micropython work again on NuttX.
Where can I find the latest efforts on this project, to try my hand on it?
Sebastien
Le 26/10/2021 à 04:16, Tomasz CEDRO a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:45 PM Xiang Xiao wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:37 PM Tomasz CEDRO
Hi Roberto,
the tag has been created.
Thanks for reporting the issue
Best regards
Alin
Från: Alin Jerpelea
Skickat: den 8 februari 2024 16:47
Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Ämne: Re: NuttX correct version
ill fix it asap thanks for pointing it out Best regards Ali
10 matches
Mail list logo