> I can't attend unfortunately but just wanted to say that if you could do a
> little bit of evangelizing for NuttX and tell people about this project,
> that would be awesome!
Don't worry, this is always the default action :)
> Seems like I will be able to attend. I'm arriving today, so have som
Hi,
Seems like I will be able to attend. I'm arriving today, so have some spare
day tomorrow just in case someone wants to get some beers together before
the event.
Best regards,
Petro
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023, 5:26 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote:
> hi
> I will be there and I hope to meet some of our awes
hi
I will be there and I hope to meet some of our awesome community members
Best regards
Alin
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023, 17:06 Nathan Hartman, wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 7:48 AM Fotis Panagiotopoulos >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is anyone planning a visit to Embedded World?
> >
> > I am fly
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 7:48 AM Fotis Panagiotopoulos
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone planning a visit to Embedded World?
>
> I am flying tonight to Nuremberg.
> It would be nice if we can arrange a meet-up!
>
> Fotis.
>
I can't attend unfortunately but just wanted to say that if you could do a
li
Agreed!
I suggested to use the new sensor because it was submitted sometime
ago and I don't see broad adoption.
Maybe it is too much for simple sensors and the fact that there is not
documentation makes things more difficult to digest.
So, I think it shouldn't be a replacement for our previous c
My thoughts: simple things should be simple. Getting temperature or
humidity values from a sensor only requires a few lines of code. A
simple character driver fells just right for me.
More code brings more potential bugs with it. The character drivers
should remain as an option for simple thin
Hello,
Is anyone planning a visit to Embedded World?
I am flying tonight to Nuremberg.
It would be nice if we can arrange a meet-up!
Fotis.
I had a quick skip through the video. My initial thoughts are:
1) This seems to be aimed at multi-sensor, multi-message systems, using uORB;
and, perhaps even, really and perhaps only intended for PX4?
2) is it a "generic" solution, that is a really good idea, and NuttX is right
to be adopting i
