Re: Bitbucket Pipeline - romfs failure

2023-02-24 Thread Simon Filgis
Hi, I changed to xxd instead of vim-common. Makes more sense. Thanks Petro. Simon -- Hard- and Softwaredevelopment Consultant Ingenieurbüro-Filgis USt-IdNr.: DE305343278 On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 2:16 PM Alan C. Assis wrote: > Hi Pedro and Simon, > > I submitted a patch to include xxd in our d

Re: Bitbucket Pipeline - romfs failure

2023-02-24 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Pedro and Simon, I submitted a patch to include xxd in our documentation. BR, Alan On 2/24/23, Petro Karashchenko wrote: > Hello Simon, > > Maybe adding "apt-get install -y xxd" -- I mean adding xxd separately > instead of vim-common and let package manager to resolve dependencies is a > be

Re: Bitbucket Pipeline - romfs failure

2023-02-24 Thread Petro Karashchenko
Hello Simon, Maybe adding "apt-get install -y xxd" -- I mean adding xxd separately instead of vim-common and let package manager to resolve dependencies is a better approach? Best regards, Petro пт, 24 лют. 2023 р. о 10:46 Simon Filgis пише: > Hi Alan, > > many thanks: > > xxd -i romfs.img | s

Re: Bitbucket Pipeline - romfs failure

2023-02-24 Thread Simon Filgis
Hi Alan, many thanks: xxd -i romfs.img | sed -e "s/^unsigned char/const unsigned char aligned_data(4)/g" >> etctmp.c /bin/sh: 1: xxd: not found rm romfs.img xxd is part of vim-common. Now it works. Should we add vim-common to the list of dependencies, or is this a corner case? Simon -- Hard-