On 08/09/2022, 18:07, "Xiang Xiao" wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 12:19 AM TimH wrote:
>> unsigned int apply_uv;/* ?? SEE BELOW [1] */
>Yes, bool is more suitable than int for apply_uv.
Thanks for confirming/agreeing - once 11.0 is released and I rebase my own
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 12:19 AM TimH wrote:
> Apologies for the long post, but given the absence of many/any voltage
> regulator drivers - especially PMICs - I feel I need to get this all sorted
> and agreed. So I have looked long and hard at the Nuttx files and Linux
> documentation and to see i
Apologies for the long post, but given the absence of many/any voltage
regulator drivers - especially PMICs - I feel I need to get this all sorted and
agreed. So I have looked long and hard at the Nuttx files and Linux
documentation and to see if I have got it right I would like to see if the
f
-1
FPU Test in ostest app fails on ESP32 and ESP32-S3. We need to include
fixes from the following PRs:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6917
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6924
Furthermore, it would be nice to include these other fixes to ESP32-S2 and
ESP32-S3 chips
+1
Please find below important information for analysis/comparison:
ESP32-DEVKITC:
==
Compiler info
-
$ xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/bin/../libexec/gcc/xtensa-esp32-elf/8.4.0/lto-wrapper
Tar
-1
At least, we should merge the recently found fixes such as
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6848
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6927
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/7015
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:37 PM Xiang Xiao
wrote:
> +1. Check with tools/chec
+1. Check with tools/checkrelease.sh script:
Downloading release files from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/11.0.0-RC1/
gpg: directory '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg' created
gpg: keybox '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
gpg: /tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnup
