Re: TIMER thougt-problem COUNT and TIME BASED together STM32F4xxx

2021-04-05 Thread raiden00pl
If PULSECOUNT is enabled, current logic in stm32_pwm.c assumes that all PWM instances support PULSECOUNT which is not true. Timers without RCR register shouldn't use pwm_pulsecount_* functions. Probably that is the problem. I guess you can do something like this: https://github.com/raiden00pl/incu

Re: 1wire subsystem

2021-04-05 Thread Juha Niskanen (Haltian)
Hi, Adding that subsystem was my first experience with 1-wire. I don't like tinkering with buses like I2C/SPI/1-wire, especially about 1-wire I have forgotten nearly all details already. Feel free to re-organize this any way you like. -Juha From: Marco Sent:

RE: PWM advanced and normal timers (STM32)

2021-04-05 Thread disruptivesolutionsnl
Thank you. Then my observation was a good one. This is not like the datasheet was telling how the driver "should" work. I was trying to solve this, but its deep in the core system where this CONFIG_PWM_PULSECOUNT has effect. If I only had more time Ben -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van:

Re: PWM advanced and normal timers (STM32)

2021-04-05 Thread raiden00pl
As far as I can remember, it never worked that way. If you enable PULSECOUNT, you can only use timers that support this feature. Other PWM instances will not work properly. sob., 3 kwi 2021 o 17:19 napisał(a): > So /dev/pmw0 = TIM1 > /dev/pmw1 = TIM4 > > All well.. but with CONFIG_PWM_PULSEC

Re: Google Summer of Code – NuttX with pysimCoder

2021-04-05 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Maxim, thanks much for response. On Tuesday 06 of April 2021 02:16:51 Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > It seems no one had time to read https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html > (I do remember I sent the link several times) I and my studnet read this, but may it be that I have overlooked somethin

Re: Google Summer of Code – NuttX with pysimCoder

2021-04-05 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello NuttX devs :) It seems no one had time to read https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html (I do remember I sent the link several times) so I'll write the process here: Once ALL Apache projects will 1) collect their ideas 2) register mentors (2 mentors are required per project) 3) got student p

Re: Google Summer of Code – NuttX with pysimCoder

2021-04-05 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Pavel, I also don't know how the process will work. I'm adding CC Maxim Solodovnik to help us. We got a student interested on integrating Rust to NuttX, his description is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CsDAZC_R32fZZkKIKL5I4IhdZRdxbFrV8utfY3bcQE4 BR, Alan https://docs.google.com

Re: Google Summer of Code – NuttX with pysimCoder

2021-04-05 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello to everybody, the time advances too fast and I expect that it is time to negotiate mentor roles. If I have not missed something, there has been no response to Michal Lenc proposal yet. Is there somebody coordinating Apache GSoC for NuttX or should we negotiate next steps with central Apache