Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-11-01 Thread Matias N.
Hi Alan, On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, at 14:52, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Since we will download the LVGL tarball with a Kconfig, we cannot > display the menuconfig before it is downloaded and decompressed. > And because its download depends on selected item on menuconfig we a > classic dilemma here

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-11-01 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Matias, The idea of using the Kconfig supplied by LVGL is to simplify our building process, but of course, it needs to avoid some drawbacks that can appear during this development. Currently we already ship our own Kconfig (apps/graphics/lvgl/Kconfig), but since LVGL is moving to Kconfig we ne

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-11-01 Thread Matias N.
I'd really hate to have to go through a separate configuration process. I would think that we are losing functionality instead of gaining something in that case. Also, if I understand correctly this would mean that we have one extra config file to handle besides NuttX's one, and we have to keep

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-11-01 Thread Brennan Ashton
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, 2:24 AM Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm confused how this would work. Don't you need to download the source > > tarball which is controlled via kconfig before you could source it? > > This is the part I'm calling "awkward", we can provide

Re: LVGL moving to Kconfig, how we could integrated better with them

2020-11-01 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
> I'm confused how this would work. Don't you need to download the source > tarball which is controlled via kconfig before you could source it? This is the part I'm calling "awkward", we can provide a dummy Kconfig that we override when we download the tarall (during context target). However we wi