Me and a mate are trying to implement the MSP protocol in NuttX so we can
also bring it back to the community. Maybe its allready done, but we could
not find it.
We really love the way one could configure your solution and flash it
through dfu. Just like betaflight does.
We will try (in the heckt
The first link gives a 404. The concept of modularity is nice, but it looks
like "just another board". Its more the choice off a mcu family and needed
criteria for your solution thats interesting. Like for e.g. the MCU finder
from STM32 and MAPS from Microchip.
Most of the solutions have a durable
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020, 2:35 PM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Sparkfun just created an interesting board ecosystem that could let
> > people to replace the MCU module and still having access to the base
> > boa
I think that is one of the good use cases of devicetree. You could indeed
easily change the device definition and have it generate the appropriate
bindings.
Best,
Matias
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020, at 18:34, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Sparkfun just created an interesting board ecosystem that could let
> people to replace the MCU module and still having access to the base
> board features:
>
> https://www.sparkfun.com/micromoddev
>
> https://www.s
Hi Everyone,
Sparkfun just created an interesting board ecosystem that could let
people to replace the MCU module and still having access to the base
board features:
https://www.sparkfun.com/micromoddev
https://www.sparkfun.com/micromod#carrier-boards
https://www.sparkfun.com/micromod#processor
