I just spent some time on this.
It is a false alarm, and seems not related to #1900.
It only happens if I have optimizations enabled. On some builds it also
happens on other functions than the aforementioned one.
It is caused by R10 contents getting corrupted. Then I realized that I need
to add t
Hi,
I think that for any non-coding/boring task the best bet (barring a paid
employee)
is to crowdsource the effort. You could compare this to the task of enforcing
code style:
it would be a huge task to convert all NuttX files to follow the code style and
most likely
no one would ever offer to
I do not think there is zero progress as at least I’ve signed a SGA to
change all the files from Xiaomi to Apache License.
Zero files have been officially cleared. That allowed us to change the
Xiaomi/Pinecone copyrighted headers to Apache headers, but we still have
no idea who all contribut
Hi Fotis,
>NuttX is not able to boot at all with this option selected. I stepped
>through the code and it seems that nxsig_initialize actually causes a stack
>overflow that is detected by the above check.
>Is this a bug, or I should configure something in a different way?
Have you seen
https://c
Hi,
I've been nearly completely out of order for the last week and a half, and I
still have to fix #1900.
Since your issue could be related:
Is nxsig_initialize really causing a stack overflow in your case, or is it a
false positive?
Johannes
> -Original Message-
> From: Fotis Panagiot
I do not think there is zero progress as at least I’ve signed a SGA to
change all the files from Xiaomi to Apache License.
For the work on cleaning the license for other files, I could ask Peter and
Xiang Xiao again to let them be more aggressive on this task. It is the
long holiday in China, will
