Re: Integrating Nuttx to a firmware project.

On 7/13/2020 3:00 PM, Fotis Panagiotopoulos wrote: Hi everyone! I am new to Nuttx but I would like to use it for my next projects. For the moment I am porting one of my big projects to Nuttx (that was previously working with another RTOS). However, I am a bit confused on how I should set up our

Re: Integrating Nuttx to a firmware project.

Hello, I personally like to create a git repository where the apps and nuttx repos are added as submodules. Unless you are going to use a pre-existing board which has everything you need, you will also eventually need to modify content inside nuttx/. An alternative is to configure nuttx to use a

Re: Integrating Nuttx to a firmware project.

Hi Fotis, There are other options: Create a branch on nuttx and apps repositoris and add your project there. This way you can keep it working and from time to time rebase it with the master. Other option is creating an apps/external directory and inside it create a link for your application, but

Integrating Nuttx to a firmware project.

Hi everyone! I am new to Nuttx but I would like to use it for my next projects. For the moment I am porting one of my big projects to Nuttx (that was previously working with another RTOS). However, I am a bit confused on how I should set up our development workflow. I will have to create my own a

Re: Millis() equivalent

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 05:41:05PM +0200, Disruptive Solutions wrote: > Is there a millis() equivalent? Where the system timer (milliseconds) is > kept solid in the back? Where you can obtain "passed system time"... > without delay interventions from threads etc? Is this what you mean? #in

Millis() equivalent

Is there a millis() equivalent? Where the system timer (milliseconds) is kept solid in the back? Where you can obtain "passed system time"... without delay interventions from threads etc?