[VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

Hello all, Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity involved in th

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:13 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020, 5:38 PM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche > > wrote: > > > I created a PR copying the release notes from Confluence to ReleaseNote > > file. > > > I did not copy the "

ftw/fts

hi, does anyone know ftw/nftw, fts, or similar libraries for nuttx? https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/nftw.html https://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?fts++NetBSD-current

Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #199

See Changes: -- [...truncated 140.88 KB...] Disabling CONFIG_ARMV7M_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABIL Enabling CONFIG_ARMV7M_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABIL Building NuttX... Normalize nucleo-l476rg/ns

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020, 5:38 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche > wrote: > > I created a PR copying the release notes from Confluence to ReleaseNote > file. > > I did not copy the "Compatibility Concerns" part, that's valuable > > information but I don'

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > I created a PR copying the release notes from Confluence to ReleaseNote file. > I did not copy the "Compatibility Concerns" part, that's valuable > information but I don't think it belongs to that file, just because > there is a lot of

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

I created a PR copying the release notes from Confluence to ReleaseNote file. I did not copy the "Compatibility Concerns" part, that's valuable information but I don't think it belongs to that file, just because there is a lot of explanation and code snippets which are not well suited for the templ

Board report due by July 1st

We are scheduled to submit our board report by July 1st. I have created a Confluence page [1] with some initial content. Please review and make any additions/changes/corrections. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/July+2020 Cheers, Nathan

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:35 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > I created PR 1277 to add that to documentation: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1277 > The Confluence landing page needs to be updated too (usually not more > than half dozen words). > Done. Thanks for the reminder.

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

With regards to bringing the release notes to the repo, that needs to go to master then backported to the release branch. Are we all on the same page with this? +1 We also need to update a couple of documentation files to add any new board, chip or architecture. Yes, there is the STM32G4

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020, 4:01 AM Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I took care of the remaining PRs in the Projects' backlog. Only the > CI one is still there, we don't have any entry for CI related changes > in our release note template, I think we should add o

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 7:01 AM Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With regards to bringing the release notes to the repo, that needs to > go to master then backported to the release branch. Are we all on the > same page with this? +1 We also need to update a cou

Re: MCU only booting from reset via SWD when compiled without optimizations?

In my case I have STM32L476, so this is not the problem. Errata document did not help either, couldn't find anything that matches my problem. On Mon, Jun 22, 2020, at 10:21, David Sidrane wrote: > Hi Matias, > > >> > > Yes, I do recall some issue with the F429's in this regard. There was > >> >

Re: MCU only booting from reset via SWD when compiled without optimizations?

Thanks for all the suggestions. When I feel brave enough I will attack this problem again and try your ideas. After almost a full day hitting the day against this issue I decided to work with flash image less than 256KB for the moment and continue with the project. Best, Matías On Mon, Jun 22,

RE: MCU only booting from reset via SWD when compiled without optimizations?

Hi Matias, >> > > Yes, I do recall some issue with the F429's in this regard. There was >> > > an errata. I believe that there are some pins in the upper 256Kb bank >> > > that interfered with some other peripheral. DavidS would know better >> > > than I. I thought it effected USB? The FLASH/USB

Re: MCU only booting from reset via SWD when compiled without optimizations?

Hello, I do not have the answer to your question. I have some notes which could help you. 1) Check the boot issues related to dual bank flash as mentioned. You have the part number with dual bank. Check the option bytes as well. 2) I met the problem that SW reset does not work if you have SWDIO w

Re: Creating 9.1.0-RC0

Hi, I took care of the remaining PRs in the Projects' backlog. Only the CI one is still there, we don't have any entry for CI related changes in our release note template, I think we should add one. With regards to bringing the release notes to the repo, that needs to go to master then backporte

Re: Interrupt restore behavior on task activate

On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:51 PM Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES) wrote: > > Hi, Brennan, > > Did you check up_get_newintctx() ? > > The function is called from up_initial_state() to create a new task > and needs to return (MSTATUS_MPPM | MSTATUS_MPIE). Yeah I had that already setup and I could not figu