Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #106

See Changes: -- [...truncated 4.52 MB...] sched/pthread_setaffinity.d sched/pthread_setschedparam.d sched/pthread_setschedprio.d sched/pthread_setspeci

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

I took a look at the STM32F4DISCOVERY guide in the wiki and a lot of the links are now wrong or broken. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/STM32F4DISCOVERY+Unix Yes, the wiki is not being well maintained.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 8:24 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > >> This is linked in the Documentation under "Getting Started" here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Documentation > >> > >> > >> Is there anything for OSX? It is mentioned as a supported platform. You > may have to do some

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

./tools/configure.sh -m stm32f4discovery:nsh -a ../apps/ ./tools/configure.sh -m nucleo-f410rb:nsh -a ../apps/ ./tools/configure.sh -m stm32f4discovery:wifi -a ../apps/ I think these argument lists are all incorrect.  -a ../apps will be interpreted as make options: $ tools/configure.sh -

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

This is linked in the Documentation under "Getting Started" here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Documentation Is there anything for OSX? It is mentioned as a supported platform. You may have to do some more work on make the compilation process easier to get IPMC votes o

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

Hi, > This is linked in the Documentation under "Getting Started" here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Documentation Is there anything for OSX? It is mentioned as a supported platform. You may have to do some more work on make the compilation process easier to get IPMC vo

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

./tools/configure.sh -m nucleo-f410rb:nsh -a ../apps/ ERROR: failed to refresh ./tools/configure.sh -m stm32f4discovery:wifi -a ../apps/ ERROR: failed to refresh Do you have the kconfig-frontends tools installed: https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/tools/src/master/

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

./tools/configure.sh -m -a ../apps teensy-2.0:hello make sh: avr-nuttx-elf-gcc: command not found ERROR: avr-nuttx-elf-gcc failed: 127 That is configured to use the NuttX buildroot toolchain . See https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/buildroot/src/master/  You probably don't want to use that. Part

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

Brennan, All the files in the NuttX Companion have Apache 2.0 License, so we can use them in NuttX if we need them. Let me know if you want to pursue that. -adam On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:38 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 6:28 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > I think mentioni

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 6:28 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > I think mentioning a common well tested platform in the README would help. > Remember to get +1 votes a IPMC member will need to be able to compile it > and some needed votes may need to come from people who are not familiar > with your project

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

Hi, > Did you put untar the 'nuttx' and 'apps' tarballs to get a directory > structure like this: > > some_directory/ > |-nuttx > |-apps Yes I did. > Could you share the error message(s), if there were any? ./tools/configure.sh -m -a ../apps teensy-2.0:hello make sh: avr-nuttx-elf-gcc: command

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

Hi, > For the DISCLAIMER, does anyone have any ideas what should be included? Just list the thing that are not in line with ASF policy, missing ASF headers would be the main one. Thanks, Justin

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

> - It would be nice to see more than " * Releases may have incomplete > licensing conditions.” in the WIP disclaimer > - In NOTICE I’d move "This product includes software developed at” to the top I created a PR to address the NOTICE file. For the DISCLAIMER, does anyone have any ideas what shou

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

We can still exclude it from the tarballs with ./tools/zipme.sh -e "uImage" Once we finish this PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/842 This type of error will be caught by our build system automatically. In this case, the uImage binary was in a PR and got merged directly into

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:23 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > For the Nuttx package: > - It's a good idea to publish your keys to a public server > Strange I see my key here. https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=0x3554D78458CEB6954B020E12E1B6E30DB05D6280&fingerprint=on&op=index - It’s a good

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:13 PM Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > > Thank you Brennan for your work! > > > Found an unexpected comped fine in the source release [1] > > I think that file shouldn't be there in the first place since it's > generated by U-Boot mkimage tool. > It slipped with a PR and th

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:23 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > I checked: > - incubating in artefact names > - signatures and hashes fine > - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK > - Found an unexpected comped fine in the source release [1] > - ASF files don’t have correct headers > - Had some issues compiling > > F

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

Thank you Brennan for your work! > Found an unexpected comped fine in the source release [1] I think that file shouldn't be there in the first place since it's generated by U-Boot mkimage tool. It slipped with a PR and the ignore file didn't come until few days ago. We can still exclude it from

Hi，Any body have some idea about both cpu can access TCP/IP stack in CPU like STM32h767

Hi， I use STM32H767 that need both cpu can access TCP/IP . I read a lot of articles ,but can't find a way . I need 2 cpu run simultaneously,perhaps use same OS such as Nuttx or different OS. (M7 run Nuttx and M4 run FreeRTOS) Can anybody give some advise ? Thanks, Steelen stee...@163.com

Re: mkrd missing from build

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. My apps folder were 153 commits behind master, updating it resolved the problem. CONFIG_FS_WRITABLE flag was omitted as of Mars 21st. Den ons 22 apr. 2020 kl 16:59 skrev Gregory Nutt : > > > nuttx$ cat .config | grep MKRD > > CONFIG_BOARDCTL_MKRD=

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Call for Validation of Apache NuttX 9.0.0 (incubating) RC0

Hi, I checked: - incubating in artefact names - signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK - Found an unexpected comped fine in the source release [1] - ASF files don’t have correct headers - Had some issues compiling From the ASF side there some minor things, most of them are likely