Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #92

See Changes: -- [...truncated 547.30 KB...] Configuring... Copy files Select CONFIG_HOST_LINUX=y Refreshing... Building NuttX... -

Re: debugging a NuttX linker problem

Thanks Greg. I found out that this resulted from an error in my Kconfig file. I was providing those functions, but they weren't getting compiled or linked due to my config settings. I corrected that Kconfig file, reran 'make menuconfig' and now my files are being compiled and linked. There's stil

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

I think we still need some organization before creating the PR. Mainly the driver section, I think it should be divided for all other subsystems. But, please, let's take this conversation to the Release Note thread. I'm still trying to get everyone's opinion on the branch naming convention. On Fr

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

Ok, I went through PRs 466-764 for bugfixes, and added a few to the wiki page. Many of the improvements were changes to conform to style, or small fixes that would not be relevant for release notes. I think we're done summarizing. Are we ready to create a PR for the Release Notes? In other words,

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

No problem, I didn't realize that you didn't include the previous commit after reviewing all PRs. I think now we have a better picture about all improvements and bugfixes from 8.2 to 9.0. BR, Alan On 4/10/20, Adam Feuer wrote: > Ok thanks Alan. I'm sorry I wasn't clear about what we had done.

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

Ok thanks Alan. I'm sorry I wasn't clear about what we had done. -adam On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:27 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Yesterday I passed all the bugfixes from nuttx-8.2 until nuttx-9.0 > tag. But I didn't checked for improvements because I thought you, > Nathan an

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

Ok, done! On 4/10/20, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Yesterday I passed all the bugfixes from nuttx-8.2 until nuttx-9.0 > tag. But I didn't checked for improvements because I thought you, > Nathan and Abdelatif did it. > > I can do it for the improvements from nuttx-8.2 until Nov. 2

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

Hi Adam, Yesterday I passed all the bugfixes from nuttx-8.2 until nuttx-9.0 tag. But I didn't checked for improvements because I thought you, Nathan and Abdelatif did it. I can do it for the improvements from nuttx-8.2 until Nov. 23 2019, no problem. BR, Alan On 4/10/20, Adam Feuer wrote: > A

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:44 PM Adam Feuer wrote: > Next we need to check for features/improvements and bugfixes between 23 > December 2019 (1st PR in github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx) and the 16 > November 2019, the date of NuttX release 8.2. The main source of info for > this would be commit me

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

P.S. I think this would have to be done for both nuttx and nuttx-apps. On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:43 AM Adam Feuer wrote: > Alan, > > Next we need to check for features/improvements and bugfixes between 23 > December 2019 (1st PR in github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx) and the 16 > November 2019,

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

Alan, Next we need to check for features/improvements and bugfixes between 23 December 2019 (1st PR in github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx) and the 16 November 2019, the date of NuttX release 8.2. The main source of info for this would be commit messages in the current master branch. Would you be w

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

Hi guys, I finished including the apps/ improvements and bugfixes. Is there anything else we need to take care? BR, Alan On 4/10/20, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: >> Speaking about the branch, Brennan is suggesting to have a different >> naming convention. Instead of nuttx-XX.YY we use releases

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

> Speaking about the branch, Brennan is suggesting to have a different > naming convention. Instead of nuttx-XX.YY we use releases/XX.YY (the > reasons behind this are here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/757) Is everyone okay with changing the branches naming convention? I perso

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Notes

> I don't need them anymore. Okay. I removed them. I also tried to re-organize a little bit. Please refer to this version of the document to have a look at the original organization: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=148645728 "Bug fixes" under "Major Changes to C