[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton opened a new pull request #18: Configure python environment and install esptool

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton opened a new pull request #18: Configure python environment and install esptool URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/18 This configures a the python user installation environment and then installs the `esptool` dependency. Should resolve the nightly build i

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396056621 ## File path: docker/linux/Dockerfile ## @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +# Licensed

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396056574 ## File path: .github/workflows/docker_linux.yml ## @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +# Licen

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396056440 ## File path: docker/linux/Dockerfile ## @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +# Licensed to the

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396056422 ## File path: .github/workflows/docker_linux.yml ## @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# Licen

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396056207 ## File path: docker/linux/Dockerfile ## @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +# Licensed to the

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #13: docker: initial checkin Dockerfile for nuttx github action container

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #13: docker: initial checkin Dockerfile for nuttx github action container URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/13#issuecomment-602150298 Replace by https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17, let close it. -

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #13: docker: initial checkin Dockerfile for nuttx github action container

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #13: docker: initial checkin Dockerfile for nuttx github action container URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/13 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #2: Multibranch pipeline job example

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #2: Multibranch pipeline job example URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/2 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pleas

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #2: Multibranch pipeline job example

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #2: Multibranch pipeline job example URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/2#issuecomment-602150220 Since the current ci system base on github action, let's close this now.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396055526 ## File path: docker/linux/Dockerfile ## @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +# Licensed

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396055892 ## File path: .github/workflows/docker_linux.yml ## @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396055462 ## File path: .github/workflows/docker_linux.yml ## @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396055892 ## File path: .github/workflows/docker_linux.yml ## @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#discussion_r396055102 ## File path: docker/linux/Dockerfile ## @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +# Licensed

Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #71

2020-03-21 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: -- [...truncated 35.96 MB...] make[3]: Leaving directory ' mkkconfig in

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton commented on issue #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton commented on issue #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17#issuecomment-602144959 @liuguo09 Sorry it took me so long to get this together after I pointed you at my proof of concept. I was tryin

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] btashton opened a new pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions

2020-03-21 Thread GitBox
btashton opened a new pull request #17: Add Dockerfile for CI system and hook into GitHub Actions URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/17 This is a reworking of the Docker container to be used with the GitHub Action CI job for github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx

Re: Breakout apps/ ?

2020-03-21 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:28 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > Hi, group, > > There has been talk for years about the idea of creating a separate > project out of apps/, extending it so that it is a real NuttX > "Distribution," basically like OpenEmbedded, Buildroot, or Yocto for > NuttX. It would: > >

Fwd: [REQUEST] Apache Project promotion factoids: deadline 25 March

2020-03-21 Thread Nathan Hartman
Hello NuttX community, This is an opportunity for us to promote both the ASF and NuttX (see attached message from ASF marketing below). Please discuss here on dev@, and let's put together a list of the 3 to 5 most "impressive" things NuttX is being used for, then once that's ready I'll forward it

Re: graphic support without framebuffer?

2020-03-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:34:41PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:54:15PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > I have a SAM4S16C, which has 128kB RAM and an ILI9325 display. > > After some initial problems (the Panel I use is wired to 16-bit bus) > > and several hardware problems

Re: graphic support without framebuffer?

2020-03-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:54:15PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > I have a SAM4S16C, which has 128kB RAM and an ILI9325 display. > After some initial problems (the Panel I use is wired to 16-bit bus) > and several hardware problems I got it fully initialized with a testpattern > instead of the normal

graphic support without framebuffer?

2020-03-21 Thread Bernd Walter
I have a SAM4S16C, which has 128kB RAM and an ILI9325 display. After some initial problems (the Panel I use is wired to 16-bit bus) and several hardware problems I got it fully initialized with a testpattern instead of the normal background color. The code is based on the SAM4E driver. ... board_l

Re: Build errors with inline functions

2020-03-21 Thread spudaneco
> Another example, we use MPU to protect the code section for NOXIP casein the > flat mode.Some have used the MPU to catch runtime NULL pointer accesses.  > There is a HowTo for this case in the Wiki.Sent from Samsung tablet. null

Re: Breakout apps/ ?

2020-03-21 Thread Disruptive Solutions
I agree. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 20 mrt. 2020 om 18:51 heeft Alan Carvalho de Assis het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi Greg, > > I agree with this idea! A NuttX distribution makes sense and will > avoid licensing issues, we could let the user to select which licenses > he accept to u