Re: Why the text displayed by SSD1306 / I2C is reversed along the vertical axis

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
Typo: SAD=SSD and I had the same “issues” with the other drivers. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 27 dec. 2019 om 08:37 heeft Disruptive Solutions > het volgende geschreven: > > Say a generic SAD 1306 through I2C. I have it working with only the block > thing just now, but wanted to try to

Re: Why the text displayed by SSD1306 / I2C is reversed along the vertical axis

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
Say a generic SAD 1306 through I2C. I have it working with only the block thing just now, but wanted to try to show some text or bitmap (battery icon or something) Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 27 dec. 2019 om 03:26 heeft Nii Jyeni het volgende > geschreven: > > At the beginning, I was n

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The volunteer could sign ICLA which isn't a problem but the work he > will do require the admin rights(setup jenkins, modify github setting > etc.), how can he finish the job if he isn't a committer? No committers or PMC members have admin rights to GitHub. > A chicken and egg problem: he

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
You can help him Xiang, and if it is jenkins I could also help. Xiang Xiao 于2019年12月27日周五 下午12:11写道: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:21 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > I can add you as an Admin to this organization > > > https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:21 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > I can add you as an Admin to this organization > > https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited collaboration > > to feed upstream. > > I would recommend not to work outside of the ASF repos, moving that to the >

Re: what does that mean if "g_cpu_irqset" equal 0x03 on SMP mode? did this mean the two cores goes into race condition?

2019-12-26 Thread Masayuki Ishikawa
Hello, > i meet times of "g_cpu_irqset==3" assert is true during daylight, but i forget keep the log file, >did this represents something wrong happen of SMP mode? In my understanding, yes, there is something wrong in the NuttX SMP kernel. Could you tell us what CPU and board you are using?

Re: Booting NuttX on SAMA5D27-XULT

2019-12-26 Thread Adam Feuer
Greg, Ok, I wired up an FTDI USB converter to UART0... PB27 (UTXD0) and PB26 (UTXR0). That also didn't work. H. I'll think about it some more. Thanks again for the help. cheers adam On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:30 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > Ok, I used the menuconfig system to set the seria

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 7:31 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > Yes, feature branch is another story, but I still need to say that, we > should not just exclude normal contributors. They do not have the > permission to push to a feature branch either... There is no problem here. Anyone can clone the rep

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Thanks for your help, Justin. On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:45 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m not your only mentor, other mentors can help you here and if mentors are > not available the PPMC can (in general) request Infra to set things up. > > > 1.incubator-nuttx-website.git need create to

Re: Booting NuttX on SAMA5D27-XULT

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Ok, I used the menuconfig system to set the serial console to UART1, 57600 baud rate. The system boots, hits the nsh_main breakpoint, I can continue to fputs, and then if I continue, then break, the system stops in the idle loop. So it seems like it's running, but the serial console isn't work

Re: Why the text displayed by SSD1306 / I2C is reversed along the vertical axis

2019-12-26 Thread Nii Jyeni
At the beginning, I was not sure what kind of OLED was used, so I tried using UG2864HSWEG01, and the result went further and further on the wrong path. Later when the SSD1306 universal driver was selected for the last attempt, it would then display normally. So I chose the wrong driver from the

Re: Booting NuttX on SAMA5D27-XULT

2019-12-26 Thread Adam Feuer
Greg, Ok, I used the menuconfig system to set the serial console to UART1, 57600 baud rate. The system boots, hits the nsh_main breakpoint, I can continue to fputs, and then if I continue, then break, the system stops in the idle loop. So it seems like it's running, but the serial console isn't w

Re: Booting NuttX on SAMA5D27-XULT

2019-12-26 Thread Adam Feuer
Greg, Thanks, I'll try this. Sorry about the two emails with the same question, after I sent the first question, I thought the subject line and question might have been unclear. -adam On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 4:37 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > In the menuconfig system I looked for a way to get a

Re: getting NSH console to listen to a particular UART?

2019-12-26 Thread Adam Feuer
Thanks for the help! And I'll keep trying with the UART1 for now. -adam On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 4:43 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > In the menuconfig system I looked for a way to get an NSH prompt on > UART2, > > but didn't find it. Is there a way to do that? If so, how? Or can I put > an > > NS

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Thanks, Duo, I posted this in the Wiki comments on your behalf. Greg On 12/26/2019 7:51 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: Thanks sir. I skimmed the wiki, we have almost the same opinion. For a feature branch, we just use same workflow, the only different is that the PR is against the feature branch, n

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
Thanks sir. I skimmed the wiki, we have almost the same opinion. For a feature branch, we just use same workflow, the only different is that the PR is against the feature branch, not master or dev. And on merging the branch back, for HBase and Hadoop, we will start a vote in the mailing list. And

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Yes, feature branch is another story, but I still need to say that, we should not just exclude normal contributors. They do not have the permission to push to a feature branch either... Yes, and that is basically what is said at that reference too.  We need to squash this notion of an uninhibi

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Hi Duo For complex feature, in Hadoop and HBase and related big data projects I’ve seen in ASF, we will create a feature branch, and then open PRs against this branch. And since it is not master, you are free to apply even half done PR if the full one is too large. And finally when you are done,

Re: getting NSH console to listen to a particular UART?

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
In the menuconfig system I looked for a way to get an NSH prompt on UART2, but didn't find it. Is there a way to do that? If so, how? Or can I put an NSH prompt on a USB interface? I mentioned that but I thought you wanted to use the CDC/ACM serial port on the AVR32.  If you want to use UART

Re: Booting NuttX on SAMA5D27-XULT

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
In the menuconfig system I looked for a way to get an NSH prompt on UART2,but didn't find it. Is there a way to do that? If so, how? The standard NSH output goes to /dev/console.  For serial devices that is controlled by the setting: CONFIG_SERIAL_UARTn_CONSOLE=y this is in the drivers/s

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
Yes, feature branch is another story, but I still need to say that, we should not just exclude normal contributors. They do not have the permission to push to a feature branch either... Gregory Nutt 于2019年12月27日 周五07:52写道: > > > Still, not every contributors are committers, they do not have the >

getting NSH console to listen to a particular UART?

2019-12-26 Thread Adam Feuer
Hi, Just restating the subject line for clarity. The SAMA5D36-Xplained has an on-chip debug serial port, the DBGU. That port board boots NuttX and the NSH console works. The SAMA5D27-XULT board has a DEBUG port, but it appears to be connected to the SAMA5D27's UART2 via a factory programmed AT32U

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
For complex feature, in Hadoop and HBase and related big data projects I’ve seen in ASF, we will create a feature branch, and then open PRs against this branch. And since it is not master, you are free to apply even half done PR if the full one is too large. And finally when you are done, start a v

Booting NuttX on SAMA5D27-XULT

2019-12-26 Thread Adam Feuer
Hi, I can compile and boot NuttX on the SAMA5D27-XULT if I disable the DBGU. There is no DBGU serial port on this chip. On the SAMA5D27-XULT this appears to be connected to UART2 via a factory programmed AT32UC3A4256HHB. In the menuconfig system I looked for a way to get an NSH prompt on UART2, b

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Still, not every contributors are committers, they do not have the permission to create branches. How can they let others know they are working on something? Open an issue or send an email to the mailing list right? And usually, the contributor set is much larger than the committer set for a pro

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
OK, confirmed. You are thinking we are like a company, but actually, we are not. We are from all around the world and there are no way to force others to do works for you. If this PR is opened by you, then it is your duty to finish it. No one else will touch it except review and comment, unless yo

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] wingunder opened a new pull request #11: Added Kconfig pin config chooser for nucleo-l432kc USARTs.

2019-12-26 Thread GitBox
wingunder opened a new pull request #11: Added Kconfig pin config chooser for nucleo-l432kc USARTs. URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/11 The USART pins were hard-coded for the nucleo-l432kc. This patch makes these pins configurable via menuconfig. -

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
Hi, I feel two things are being blurred together here. There is a How and a What. The What is NuttX: +1 - There (should be) no uninhibited or unfettered NuttX changes. The How - There should uninhibited and unfettered access to the repo and tools to do our parts (jobs) using today's best practic

JIRA [was Re: Apache NuttX website]

2019-12-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, >> 2.NuttX JIRA database need be created > > I tried to create this, but seem like there may be an issue, I’ve asked Infra > for advice. And sorted, you now have: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTTX Thanks, Justin

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Of course, all works occurs "outside of the ASF repos" on clones or forks. > There is no real way to work "inside" the ASF repos. Normally, you would work > on a fork of the ASF repos and submit PRs to the ASF repos. Normally on other ASF project, I work on a clone, but that a private lo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The wiki is also not the most friendly to use for > collaboration and has no method of tracking changes (at least to my > knowledge). It tracks changes and you can revert to a previous version, so there’s no issues there. > Of course we can squash it all together at the end when/if we me

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
I can add you as an Admin to this organization https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited collaboration to feed upstream. I would recommend not to work outside of the ASF repos, moving that to the ASF then requires a grant and contributors to sign ICLAs, and companies to

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’m not your only mentor, other mentors can help you here and if mentors are not available the PPMC can (in general) request Infra to set things up. > 1.incubator-nuttx-website.git need create to host the website self Someone else has already created this. > 2.NuttX JIRA database need be c

OT: Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
(My statements about dictatorship were also just semantics.  But let's let that dead dog lie.) Okay.. I will wake up the dead dog a bit.  It was mistake to use the word dictator.  I should have simply said "I will handle the PRs and patches until the work flow is ready".  No one would have o

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
I can add you as an Admin to this organization https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited collaboration to feed upstream. I would recommend not to work outside of the ASF repos, moving that to the ASF then requires a grant and contributors to sign ICLAs, and companies to g

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 4:21 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > What's wrong will collaborating in the ASF repos? You don’t need to be a > committer to collaborate and doing so means you are more likely to become > one. People seem to have a hard time wrapping their mind around that -- the stumbling blo

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I can add you as an Admin to this organization > https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited collaboration > to feed upstream. I would recommend not to work outside of the ASF repos, moving that to the ASF then requires a grant and contributors to sign ICLAs, and compani

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 12:43 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > I would like to propose a method of collaboration for the workflow > > requirements. Nathan and Brennan have done some legwork that is now on > the > > Wiki - which is a great starting point. Unfortunately, it hasn't seen > much > > colla

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
As a spectator these mailings are like cabaret ... and I do not have to buy tickets :-) Is a wild discussion without any consensus and everyone seems to know better of have better ideas. But nothings seems to happen. Sorry for putting it this way, but sometimes a mirror helps Do first

Re: Release Manager

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/REEF/Release+Manager+Guide Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 26 dec. 2019 om 16:11 heeft Gregory Nutt het > volgende geschreven: > > With all of the talk about work flow, there are several other things that we > need to keep our eye on. One is rele

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Just create https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-website to host website. But JIRA database need Justin help out. On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:50 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > After try the test website, something need to take: > > 1.incubator-nuttx-website.git need create to host the website

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
I would like to propose a method of collaboration for the workflow requirements. Nathan and Brennan have done some legwork that is now on the Wiki - which is a great starting point. Unfortunately, it hasn't seen much collaboration other than a few comments. Probably more than a few.  A lot of

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Just send out the invitation to all PPMC except Alin. Alin, could you associate your apache account with github account? I suspect Alin may not be available over the holidays.  Many people will not be. I believe that Alin's github name is jerpelea.  He may have other preferences, however.

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Related trademark issues.. but off-topic. IIRC someone has already said but let me speak it again, NuttX trademarks will be transfer to ASF so you can not use NuttX outside ASF any more, unless you get the permit, by sending an email to the trademarks@apache. Yes, but the trademarks are not

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Nathan, -Original Message- From: Nathan Hartman [mailto:hartman.nat...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 7:45 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Workflow Development On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:48 AM Xiang Xiao wrote: > > I need correct something here: > 1.Haitao don't

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:48 AM Xiang Xiao wrote: > > I need correct something here: > 1.Haitao don't try or prepare PX4 workflow in github.com/nuttx, we > just do the workflow defined by PPMC > 2.Haitao try the workflow work outside apache just because he don't > have the right > 3.Any work done

RE: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
>Why I have to visit every fork to see what is happening in the project? I just need to check the PRs and issues. Because before a Branch becomes a PR you will not know it is a Work in Progress (WIP) > Open a issue before you do this please? You could but, because it is not an issue that carries

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
After try the test website, something need to take: 1.incubator-nuttx-website.git need create to host the website self 2.NuttX JIRA database need be created Jira is created at https://selfserve.apache.org/ .  But that i s "Access restricted to ASF members and PMC chairs only!".  You will need

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
After try the test website, something need to take: 1.incubator-nuttx-website.git need create to host the website self 2.NuttX JIRA database need be created 3.http://nuttx.incubator.apache.org need update Who familiar with infra can do a favor? Thanks Xiang On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:48 PM Hans w

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
IIRC someone has already said but let me speak it again, NuttX trademarks will be transfer to ASF so you can not use NuttX outside ASF any more, unless you get the permit, by sending an email to the trademarks@apache. Yes, but the trademarks are not transferred to the ASF until we graduate. 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:51 AM Anthony Merlino wrote: > I have started a CONTRIBUTORS.md file in a personal fork of incubator-nuttx: > > https://github.com/antmerlino/incubator-nuttx/blob/antmerlino-contributors-md/CONTRIBUTORS.md > > For those not familiar, CONTRIBUTORS.md is a common file found

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
IIRC someone has already said but let me speak it again, NuttX trademarks will be transfer to ASF so you can not use NuttX outside ASF any more, unless you get the permit, by sending an email to the trademarks@apache. Gregory Nutt 于2019年12月26日周四 下午10:50写道: > +1 > > Thank you for stating what sho

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
David Sidrane 于2019年12月26日周四 下午10:06写道: > >Then why committers have a different workflow comparing to contributors? > > It is the same work flow just different locations and rights. > > >Why not also create branches in your own forked repo? > > They can, nothing is stopping them. If their role:c

Re: [nuttx] Wiki Backup

2019-12-26 Thread Brennan Ashton
Xiang, Unfortunately it's currently stalled waiting for Apache INFRA. Confluence has made this a complicated task likely requiring export and import or something similarly invasive. Wish I had known that beforehand, we could have just used NUTTX and deleted it until we got it right... https://iss

Release Manager

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
With all of the talk about work flow, there are several other things that we need to keep our eye on.  One is releases. I think that one person on the PPMC should step up and volunteer to coordinate releases as a Release Manager (RM).  I don't know what all is involved in the Apache release pr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Brennan Ashton
For what it is worth that is no longer my proposal which is fine (someone should likely drop my name from the title). Also the last few days have been holiday time for many people. I for instance left my laptop at home, and editing docs on a phone did not seem like a great use of time. With conflu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
+1 Give it a go +1 move it There is no reason to rush.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Things are stalled no because of the Holidays.  You are looking at only about 2-3 days of of 1-hour per day effort.  It wouldn't hurt to wait for a few days when people are better able to contribute. Brennan and Nathan have been the sole "authors" of the document.  I have not been directly con

RE: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
+1 Give it a go +1 move it -Original Message- From: Anthony Merlino [mailto:anth...@vergeaero.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 6:52 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow Hi all, I would like to propose a method of collaboration for the work

[PROPOSAL] Collaboration on NuttX Workflow

2019-12-26 Thread Anthony Merlino
Hi all, I would like to propose a method of collaboration for the workflow requirements. Nathan and Brennan have done some legwork that is now on the Wiki - which is a great starting point. Unfortunately, it hasn't seen much collaboration other than a few comments. I believe part of the issue her

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
+1 Thank you for stating what should be obvious. On 12/26/2019 8:48 AM, Xiang Xiao wrote: I need correct something here: 1.Haitao don't try or prepare PX4 workflow in github.com/nuttx, we just do the workflow defined by PPMC 2.Haitao try the workflow work outside apache just because he don't ha

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
I need correct something here: 1.Haitao don't try or prepare PX4 workflow in github.com/nuttx, we just do the workflow defined by PPMC 2.Haitao try the workflow work outside apache just because he don't have the right 3.Any work done by Haitao even in github.com/nuttx should be reviewed by all PPMC

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
It unblocks Haitao Liu. Xiami's tool master. -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 6:39 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Workflow Development > Uh what exactly is going on? Essentially, they are taking the develo

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
I want to avoid upsetting you. Let me be more direct and ask to you be more direct. Greg are you going to be using language like "abuse of power" if we are creating repos, branches pushing to the github NuttX organization? Yes on No? As you put it YES.  If must follow the same workflow as a

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Uh what exactly is going on? Essentially, they are taking the development of the NuttX workflow automation outside of the project and developing it independently.  Presumably it would come back into the project at a later date.  This is not in the hands of the PPMC, but we should take

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
I want to avoid upsetting you. Let me be more direct and ask to you be more direct. Greg are you going to be using language like "abuse of power" if we are creating repos, branches pushing to the github NuttX organization? Yes on No? David -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:s

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
All PPMC should have the equal rights. This is the essence of "THE APACHE WAY", do I understand correctly? You will not have equal rights on any development outside of the Apache project.  The PPMC authority does not extend to other, external projects.

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Nathan, github.com/nuttx is a sedentary location for thing which can't handle in the official apache repository: 1.Some contributor don't have rights to modify the apache infra to try and prepare the workflow. 2.The companion repo(build, tools ,ucLibc++ etc) need find a location before we can put t

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
You have been granted admin access to NuttX. Admins have full rights to the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams Do ALL the PPMC agree that ALL have FULL unfetter access? The PPMC has no direct control of anything that is happening outside of the project.  The

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
All PPMC should have the equal rights. This is the essence of "THE APACHE WAY", do I understand correctly? On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:14 PM David Sidrane wrote: > > This came to me. > > You have been granted admin access to NuttX. Admins have full rights to the > organization and have complete a

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:14 AM David Sidrane wrote: > This came to me. > > You have been granted admin access to NuttX. Admins have full rights to the > organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams > > Do ALL the PPMC agree that ALL have FULL unfetter access? Uh what

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
This came to me. You have been granted admin access to NuttX. Admins have full rights to the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams Do ALL the PPMC agree that ALL have FULL unfetter access? David -Original Message- From: Xiang Xiao [mailto:xiaoxiang781...@g

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
Awesome - We should have done this on the day we landed in ASF. -Original Message- From: Xiang Xiao [mailto:xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 5:53 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Workflow Development Just send out the invitation to all PPMC except Alin.

RE: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
>Then why committers have a different workflow comparing to contributors? It is the same work flow just different locations and rights. >Why not also create branches in your own forked repo? They can, nothing is stopping them. If their role:contributors that is the only option and the one they

what does that mean if "g_cpu_irqset" equal 0x03 on SMP mode? did this mean the two cores goes into race condition?

2019-12-26 Thread 曹子龙
HI folks: i meet times of "g_cpu_irqset==3" assert is true during daylight, but i forget keep the log file, did this represents something wrong happen of SMP mode?

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Just send out the invitation to all PPMC except Alin. Alin, could you associate your apache account with github account? Anthony also need update it. BTW, github.com/nuttx is a good place for the remaining repo until we find some way to put them into apache. Thanks Xiang On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
On 12/26/2019 7:49 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: ... Duo should also have access to any external, third party repositories for workflow development.  He has also offered to contribute to the NuttX workflow in the past.

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
Then why committers have a different workflow comparing to contributors? Why not also create branches in your own forked repo? David Sidrane 于2019年12月26日周四 下午9:36写道: > Hi Duo, > > > Sure - I just do not which above questions you are referring too, there are > 67 ? in the post > > I guess this on

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Why we not reuse github.com/nuttx to do the test? That is essentially the same as nuttx-to-asf.  Justin did point out that once I grant the NuttX trademark to apache, we will no longer be able to use that name without permission.  So bother are only good while are a podling (which will be

SGA for the PX4 (was RE: Workflow Development)

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
I will ask Lorenz for a definitive answer. -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 5:43 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Workflow Development > Will we get an SGA for the PX4 code that will come in? If not, it > cannot

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Gregory Nutt
Will we get an SGA for the PX4 code that will come in? If not, it cannot become Apache. I think that all new files will need the Apache source file header:  https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html That references special handling for 3rd party files like PX4 (with no SGA).

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
The PPMC does not have admin on it -Original Message- From: Xiang Xiao [mailto:xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 5:39 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Workflow Development Why we not reuse github.com/nuttx to do the test? On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:31 PM

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
Your invited with full admin! -Original Message- From: Haitao Liu [mailto:liugu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 5:34 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Workflow Development David, my github username liuguo09 liugu...@gmail.com. We could do some tests to prepare for f

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Why we not reuse github.com/nuttx to do the test? On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:31 PM Haitao Liu wrote: > > David, my github username liuguo09 liugu...@gmail.com. We could do some > tests to prepare for final workflow. > > David Sidrane 于2019年12月26日周四 下午4:55写道: > > > Hi Haitao, > > > > I can add you

RE: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Duo, Sure - I just do not which above questions you are referring too, there are 67 ? in the post I guess this one? > For contributors other than committers, especial it is not their projects, the repo is not writable to them, and how can they create branches on the repo? Contributors | <

Re: User Email Account

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev list? Thanks Xiang On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM spudaneco wrote: > > I may grumble

Re: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread Haitao Liu
David, my github username liuguo09 liugu...@gmail.com. We could do some tests to prepare for final workflow. David Sidrane 于2019年12月26日周四 下午4:55写道: > Hi Haitao, > > I can add you as an Admin to this organization > https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited > collaboration > t

Re: Software release life cycle choices could have implications on workflow (was RE: Single Committer)

2019-12-26 Thread Duo Zhang
Hey David, could you please explain the above questions a bit? Since you want to create PR branches at the official repo, then how could a contributor other than committer contribute code? He/she just does not have the permission to create a branch. Thanks. David Sidrane 于2019年12月26日周四 下午4:45写道

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread spudaneco
We should get a quick read from Justin: is developing substantial code outside of incubator acceptable? And how do we get a proper review againet the workflow requirements before merging upstream?You really should wait for the workflow requirements first or be completely open to rework.Will we g

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #10: wireless: remove unnecessary flags

2019-12-26 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #10: wireless: remove unnecessary flags URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/10 and some flags(e.g. IW_TXPOW_NFLAGS) is wrong actually Change-Id: I6fe0c6705f5d67a66c7427ec617cf34813b5f6ee Signed-off-by: chao.an ---

Re: User Email Account

2019-12-26 Thread spudaneco
I may grumble a bit bur I always follow Justin's advice.I do think that NuttX is diferent from other new podlings because  began with a huge user base and has a few different needs on day 1 as a mature project.I don't believe that finding new committers will be a problem.Sent from Samsung tablet

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #1: Wapi simplify

2019-12-26 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #1: Wapi simplify URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitH

Re: [nuttx] Wiki Backup

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Can we move wiki from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTXTEST to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX now? Thanks Xiang On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:59 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > In the past nuttx.org was just the wiki, but I see that there is a standard > > te

Re: [GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo merged pull request #1: imxrt fixes

2019-12-26 Thread Xiang Xiao
Should we move GitBox email to other list like rev...@nuttx.apache.org? Thanks Xiang On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM GitBox wrote: > > patacongo merged pull request #1: imxrt fixes > URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1 > > > > > -

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Hans
Thank you Ben! Both of them are fixed. ;-) Best Regards, Huahang On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:28 PM Disruptive Solutions < disruptivesolution...@gmail.com> wrote: > NuttX Team Members > --> code incompletion > > Wiki jumps to the wrong link I think? Jou want to jump to the "home" Wiki > "Nuttx"?

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
NuttX Team Members --> code incompletion Wiki jumps to the wrong link I think? Jou want to jump to the "home" Wiki "Nuttx"? my 2 cents Ben Op do 26 dec. 2019 om 11:24 schreef Hans : > Hi all, > > I forked the great work Brennan has done and put it on Github Pages > (temporarily) for you guys

Re: [DISCUSS] Simple Workflow Proposal - not so simple?

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
Ow and: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/intro-user.html And not about tools... but they have implemented workflow... Op ma 23 dec. 2019 om 23:24 schreef Disruptive Solutions < disruptivesolution...@gmail.com>: > Did you look at https://www.atlassian.com/nl/software/crucible

Re: Apache NuttX website

2019-12-26 Thread Hans
Hi all, I forked the great work Brennan has done and put it on Github Pages (temporarily) for you guys to review. https://apache-nuttx-website.github.io/ I happen to have some Jekyll and web development experiences. And I also know some professional graphics designers who have agreed to help wit

Re: Why the text displayed by SSD1306 / I2C is reversed along the vertical axis

2019-12-26 Thread Disruptive Solutions
Maybe you could share your defconfig? And did you had to add files to src? And/or header files? Maybe others could benefit also from your journey? Ben Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 26 dec. 2019 om 04:23 heeft Nii Jyeni het volgende > geschreven: > > Thanks, I found a solution. I used th

RE: Workflow Development

2019-12-26 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Haitao, I can add you as an Admin to this organization https://github.com/nuttx-to-asf it sole purpose is uninhibited collaboration to feed upstream. We can collaborate there. We can do all the setup and testing there, perfect it and upstream it to ASF. We can also figure out what we cannot ac

  1   2   >