Re: ICLA needed?

Hi, Question that need to answered on the legal discuss list: A) Was the copyright assignment to Greg implied or explicitly stated somewhere? From a quick look at the docs I was unable to find anything. B) If the answer is no above who are teh list of people who have made significant contributio

Re: ICLA needed?

Hi, OK it now seems that we may need more than just Greg's SGA. I’ve give the thread a couple of days and see what happens. Thanks, Justin

ICLA needed?

Hi, I asked on legal discuss if we needed ICLAs from previous committers. [1] My reading of that so far is the grant is OK, and we won’t need ICLAs from all committers. Greg if you have something to add you can reply to that thread. Thanks, Justin 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d58f

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi, > Hehe.. nutty-apps :-D That was autocorrect I think. It was [1] so I didn’t mistype it when creating it this time :-) Thanks, Justin 1. https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-nuttx-apps.git

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Justin, do you mind to rename it from app to apps ? I’ve created an incubator-nutty-apps one and asked Infra how to remove the other one. Hehe.. nutty-apps :-D There are some pretty crazy applications in there. G

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi, > There would be less confusion if the repository were called apps instead of > nuttx-apps[s], but it appears the the project name on the front of the > repository is an Apache convention. Yes as is incubating for incubating projects. > In the release tarballs, the names have been apps-x.y

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi, > Justin, do you mind to rename it from app to apps ? I’ve created an incubator-nutty-apps one and asked Infra how to remove the other one. Thanks, Justin

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Alan, Hmm, I think it could create some confusion because all docs and even the build system expects to find the applications directory at ../apps/ Justin, do you mind to rename it from app to apps ? You note that the git clone with no argument will create nuttx-app/ (or nuttx-apps/), right? 

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi Greg and Justin, On Saturday, December 14, 2019, Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> So I created: >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-app.git > > At nit: Historically, the directory is call apps/ not app/. That is the way it

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

So I created: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-app.git At nit:  Historically, the directory is call apps/ not app/. That is the way it is referred to in all of the documentation of and the consciousness of NuttX user

Re: Workflow and Release strategy Proposal (Was RE: Project Emails)

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 6:52 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > HI Justin, > > On 12/13/19, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would have no issue with keeping the linked in group, especially it > used > > like that. It would be best to share ownership of it to all the PPMC. > Many > > proje

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

HI, I created the repos there was an issue in that it didn’t like incubator-nuttx-nuttx, which I guess is a bit silly. So I created: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-app.git You can see the mirror repos here: https://git

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi, > I am unsure of the terminology "report". I assume this is the name of the > GIT repository? For consistency, the name of the repositories should be > apps/ and nuttx/. Sorry I meant repos. I’ll go ahead and create them. Thanks, Justin

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

This doesn't seem to accept my LDAP credentials. Actually, it does. I can log in but I don't seem to have authority to do anything. Fixed - any NuttX committer will now be able to add/edit/comment on pages. Opening it wider than that may attract spam. Thanks! I had to limit the DocuWiki

Re: Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi, > This doesn't seem to accept my LDAP credentials. Actually, it does. I can > log in but I don't seem to have authority to do anything. Fixed - any NuttX committer will now be able to add/edit/comment on pages. Opening it wider than that may attract spam. > Now that the SGA has been file

Confluence/Repos (Was Atomic git tagging)

Hi, Justin I really don’t think there will be any issues doing both in parallel so I’ve created a confluence space here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX Thanks! This doesn't seem to accept my LDAP credentials.  Actually, it does.  I can log in but I don't seem to have autho

Point of order.

Point of order. Recognizing that using the ASF mailing list is all new to some of us. I would like to ask people to keep on topic in threads. Greg raised the issue that the PPMC is not getting things done. I think it is impossible to organize an effort without communication that is focused. Plea

Re: Atomic git tagging (was RE: Project Emails)

  I am trying to get everything moved to apache.org, bit at a time. Slack channels are shutting down, the word is slowly getting out in the Google group.  .. I have removed the Slack application from most of my machines.  I have deactivated the accounts of all Inactive members.  I will

Re: Atomic git tagging (was RE: Project Emails)

Hi, Justin No, AFAIK, no SGA's have been filed. The wording here is https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ip_clearance.html is unclear to me under "Establishing Provenance". Contributor in this case refers to copyright holders, I assume? This only applies to code you are giving to the ASF (it’