+1 binding
Thanks for the replies, the lazy consensus vote passes!
Regards,
David Handermann
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:52 AM Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> +1 from me
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:57 AM David Handermann <
> exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Following initial po
+1 the un-lazy way
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 7:57 AM David Handermann <
exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> Team,
>
> Following initial positive feedback on NIP-7 [1] proposing the
> addition of a Flow Action Reporter interface as a framework extension,
> I am calling for a lazy-consensus [2] app
+1 from me
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:57 AM David Handermann <
exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> Team,
>
> Following initial positive feedback on NIP-7 [1] proposing the
> addition of a Flow Action Reporter interface as a framework extension,
> I am calling for a lazy-consensus [2] approval o
Team,
Following initial positive feedback on NIP-7 [1] proposing the
addition of a Flow Action Reporter interface as a framework extension,
I am calling for a lazy-consensus [2] approval of the proposal.
If there are no objections to the proposal within three days, NIP-7
will be considered approv
