Certainly can appreciate that sentiment, Tony. I have a pretty good flow
doing reviews that kind of abstracts away the fact that it is a PR versus
just another branch/remote. However, when it comes to code reviews, the
vast majority of my effort happens in GitHub at the moment. I believe
there a
I don’t think enabling this feature requires contributors to provide patches
via GitHub, as attaching patches to the Jira is still available. I see this
improving the workflow for the committers who are reviewing and merging PRs.
Encapsulating some of the repetitive git invocations that committe
Worth considering, this twitter post has been circulating the blogosphere:
https://twitter.com/agentdero/status/889582259522736128
I'd like to ensure we don't forget other means of providing patches
(attaching a patch to a ticket). While github is convenient to some, using
it as the sole source of
I'm a strong +0. I don't think think it is a huge step forward, but it
isn't a step back either.
On Jul 28, 2017 5:42 PM, "Andy LoPresto" wrote:
> +1 to enable gitbox.
>
> Andy LoPresto
> alopre...@apache.org
> *alopresto.apa...@gmail.com *
> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E
+1 to enable gitbox.
Andy LoPresto
alopre...@apache.org
alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> +1, I meant to bring this up after I saw the conversation on the Apache
> Streams list.
+1, I meant to bring this up after I saw the conversation on the Apache Streams
list. Seems like a great improvement to the workflow!
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
> +1 to move to gitbox
>
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
>>
>> Excellent. Thanks
+1 to move to gitbox
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Excellent. Thanks for the input, Suneel. The before and after links are
> especially helpful.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
> > We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and
Excellent. Thanks for the input, Suneel. The before and after links are
especially helpful.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and even had a
> release immediately.
>
> Yes, the PR commit workflow is lot simpler now w
Also from OpenNLP -- yes, the workflow is much simpler and faster. I highly
recommend it.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and even had a
> release immediately.
>
> Yes, the PR commit workflow is lot simpler now with
We migrated Apache OpenNLP to gitbox (beginning of July) and even had a
release immediately.
Yes, the PR commit workflow is lot simpler now with gitbox (just a button
click).
I would definitely recommend moving Nifi to gitbox, if anything it makes a
committer's life lot easier.
Before Gitbox, t
Hey folks,
I saw mention on the Incubator general mailing list about Gitbox [1]. From
that message it seems like it would help considerably with some of the
maintenance tasks we perform on the repository. Has anyone in the
community used it on another project and have any opinions on it?
Doing
11 matches
Mail list logo
