Re: hello. I would like to inquire about an error when upgrading the version.

hello. The data provided appears to be sufficient for testing as we have tested it several times and sent the problematic data. I think it's almost certain because we've tested it multiple times on Linux and Mac and only the problematic data has been clearly extracted. I'm almost 100% sure it do

Re: [DISCUSS] End-of-life timing for NiFi 1

I think this is a good proposal. I would also like to share my experience as an integration consultant implementing various integration systems for large enterprises. In general, these organizations are very conservative. The milestone releases (like those for 2.0) are completely ignored. It does

Re: [DISCUSS] End-of-life timing for NiFi 1

To be actionable and concrete here is a proposal: 1. Declare the NiFi 1.28.x line as the 'End of Life/End of Support' line. This means we may still do periodic bug fixes or when possible/reasonable bump vulnerable libs. But we will not be doing further analysis/triage of security reports nor addi

Re: JOLT UI comments issue

Thanks Matt! I added it as a subtask. On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 12:16 PM Matt Gilman wrote: > Dan, > > Many UI items associated with the migration from the old UI are being > tracked here [1]. Adding items as sub tasks there would be good. > > Thanks > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NI

Re: JOLT UI comments issue

Dan, Many UI items associated with the migration from the old UI are being tracked here [1]. Adding items as sub tasks there would be good. Thanks [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13475 On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 12:06 PM Dan S wrote: > I just wanted to let the UI folks I created NI

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Timing for NiFi 1.28.0

Ferenc, Thanks for the RM work on the 1.28 release. Are you up for doing a 1.28.1 release in the coming days? There are a few bugs fixed worth grabbing then a security relevant update both in the form of a DISCLAIMER file that will help communicate to users about the go forward nature of the 1.x

Re: JOLT UI Specification and Content windows seem small

I was able solve this by the suggestion of a teammate to use control - (minues) to zoom out which allowed for more space. On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:19 PM Dan S wrote: > I am trying to exercise the current JOLT UI in 2.0.0 which I feel is a > huge improvement over the old JOLT UI. Thank you UI te

JOLT UI comments issue

I just wanted to let the UI folks I created NIFI-13959 to address the inability to have comments in both the JOLT template and content windows in the JOLT UI. I wasn't sure if there was some label(s) I needed to add to the ticket or not. Please adv

Re: [DISCUSS] End-of-life timing for NiFi 1

Team, I will start a discussion thread on the users list so we can hear more inputs from them and from that perspective. This thread needs to focus on what the contributors/committers/PMC in the community can/will/should do and the PMC in particular as we're obligated to ensure we're putting out

Re: hello. I would like to inquire about an error when upgrading the version.

Hi, I looked into it and this seems to be a rather interesting situation :) First of all, this does not relate to Jackson and I don't think there is a regression in NiFi versions. I think you may have received specific data for the first time that is causing this issue. Are you absolutely sure th

Re: [DISCUSS] End-of-life timing for NiFi 1

Hi all, While I think we could set an EOL date a bit further in the future, it is important to keep in mind what EOL means. It only means we won't be providing security fixes / bug fixes through new releases. It does not mean that NiFi 1.x is gone. If that is a big concern for some users when runn

RE: [DISCUSS] End-of-life timing for NiFi 1

Hi all, I understand the reasons to declare an EOL quickly, given the external dependencies, but like Russell said before the short notice is going to cause trouble with our bigger corporate customers. It would have been nice to have the EOL date announced about a year ago, even if it had been