Re: [mojo-dev] Re: Build-Helper-Maven-Plugin / Build-MetaData-Maven-Plugin

2013-04-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Avaz, putting configurations in a jar is probably the best solution. One hack I use in multimodule projects is ${user.dir} which often is the reactor root and works when you start your builds always from the root. I could not figure out how to correctly have the configuration jar to be a mo

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Eric Dalquist as Mojo Committer

2013-05-11 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 10, 2013 6:20 PM, "Robert Scholte" wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to invite Eric Dalquist as Mojo Committer. > He has continued the development of the jspc-maven-plugin on his own > fork.[1] > I've contacted Eric about this and he would like to join the

Re: [mojo-dev] Active/inactive committers and plugins

2013-05-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello everyone, maybe we should deprecate some old plugins or at least state that further development might not be in the public interest. Now that JDK6 has reached it's end of life, the corbertura-maven-plugin will not be of big use. Hm, just as I write this, cobertura seems to see new activity (

[mojo-dev] OT: jacoco Was: Re: [mojo-dev] Active/inactive committers and plugins

2013-05-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
coco does not give coverage from exception paths, and hence is not as > accurate... But that may have been fixed > > > On Wednesday, 15 May 2013, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> maybe we should deprecate some old plugins or at least state that

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Rickard von Essen as Mojo Committer

2013-05-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 20, 2013 8:45 AM, "Anders Hammar" wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to invite Rickard von Essen as Mojo Committer. > > Rickard has submitted several good patches and shown some love for the RPM > plugin, which it is in need of. I've talked to Rickard and h

Re: [mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-1776) Allow setting of classifer for artifacts

2013-05-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello there, AFAIK from my in-house JIRA experiences you need to fiddle on the disk and edit (jelly? freemarker?) templates. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 23, 2013 5:46 PM, "Baptiste MATHUS" wrote: > Do you think I should file an HAUS JIRA or is there some crazily powerful > desp

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Steve Christou as a mojo committer

2013-05-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1, competition is good though I do not believe I may force my company pom users to another coverage tool twice in one year :-). Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Bapt

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Versions Maven Plugin 2.1

2013-06-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to release Versions Maven Plugin 2.1 > We fixed 2 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-5

2013-06-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hi, I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-5 of the extra-enforcer-rules Extra Enforcer Rules. These are extra rules for Apache Maven's Enforcer Plugin. We solved 3 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%22extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-5%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20MOJO

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Lennart Jorelid as mojo committer

2013-06-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > -- > Olivier > > On Jun 22, 2013 6:28 PM, "Baptiste MATHUS" wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> As you migh

[mojo-dev] Promote extra-enforcer-rules Was: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-5

2013-06-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Jun 23, 2013 3:31 AM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > > +1 > > We must be near 1.0-beta-1 by now ;-) > What's in a name ;-)? Maybe the extra-enforcer-rules could be an official project? Regards Mirko

[mojo-dev] [RESULT] [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-5

2013-06-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
The vote resulted in: + 1 by Baptiste, Mirko, Olivier, Robert, Stephan and Tony. I will proceed with releasing. Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[mojo-dev] [ANN] extra-enforcer-rules 1.0-alpha-5 Released

2013-06-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
[MOJO-1931] - RequirePropertyDiverges fails if configuration elements are in wrong order ** Improvement * [MOJO-1930] - RFE: RequirePropertyDiverges: Extend the rule to include a custom message Enjoy, The Mojo team. Mirko Friedenhagen --

Re: [mojo-dev] Is there a planned rpm-maven-plugin release?

2013-06-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Baptiste, I think it would be great you made the release-manager. I would suggest a SNAPSHOT deploy of the trunk with the fix and Daniels confirmation, that the fix worked for him before, though. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jun 25, 2013 6:11 PM, "Baptiste Mathus" wrote: > Hi,

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Move Sysdeo Tomcat Maven Plugin to graveyard

2013-06-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jun 29, 2013 4:54 PM, "Robert Scholte" wrote: > Hi, > > While going through our plugins I came across the Sysdeo Tomcat Maven > Plugin. [1] (notice the retro style in the breadcrumbs bar) > The last time it was was published was august 25th 2008, in th

[mojo-dev] Proposal: include SCM link and KEYS file in vote

2013-07-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, on the maven-dev list there are some discussions about the templates for votes, they should include a SCM link to the tag including the revision/hash and a link to the KEYS file. While I do not want to complicate the process here with missing license headers etc., at least a link to the ta

Re: [mojo-dev] Proposal: include SCM link and KEYS file in vote

2013-07-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
cked out > the wrong tag and which wouldn't had happened if he or she knew the > revision. > > I'd prefer to do the KEYS check as part of the release, which should be > possible if I'm correct but hasn't been implemented yet. > > Robert > > > > On F

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Migrate mojo from subversion to git

2013-07-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 for moving to git from me as well. We. use Maven in about 1000 inhouse projects (95% still using SVN) and Maven adding artifactId out of the blue at free will in inheriting projects is a pain in the neck for SVN as well, while trying out releases completely locally with git is really helpful IMO

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Migrate mojo from subversion to git

2013-07-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
ect sites. > There should be no other interaction between the CM system and site > publishing. > > On Jul 24, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen > wrote: > > +1 for moving to git from me as well. We. use Maven in about 1000 inhouse > projects (95% still using SVN) and Ma

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Krzysztof Dębski

2013-08-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Aug 25, 2013 12:15 PM, "Robert Scholte" wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to invite Krzysztof to become a committer for the mojo team. > He has provided several good patches for the aspectj-maven-plugin, Lennart > can confirm this as well. > I've already asked

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Extra Enforcer Rules version 1.0-beta-1

2013-08-31 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1, ran the current trunk of extra-enforcer-rules with version 1.3.1 of the enforcer-plugin and some local projects with Maven 3.0.5 and Maven 3.1.0 and the uploaded 1.0-beta-1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfried

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Retire JBoss Maven Plugin

2013-09-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > +1 > > > On Friday, 6 September 2013, Robert Scholte wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> it seems like JBoss is maint

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Lukas Krejci as committer

2013-09-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Sep 20, 2013 1:46 AM, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: > Hi, > > Lukas Krejci provided some patches for clirr plugin. > So as nobody take care of this plugin, it can be a good idea to have > someone more fixing issues. > > My +1 > > Vote open for 72H with lazy co

Re: [mojo-dev] JDepend Maven Plugin

2013-12-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Dec 28, 2013 7:46 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" wrote: > > Hi to all > > 2. This plugin currently forks the life-cycle compile (generate): > >The question is: Why is this necessary (may be i misunderstand >a thing with those forking of the life-cycle)? >Wouldn't it be better having diff

Re: [mojo-dev] Do some updates on mojo-parent?

2014-01-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 for updating the Plugins. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jan 9, 2014 3:50 PM, "Tony Chemit" wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like a new release of mojo-parent, since you can't build the site > without > > (1) maven-site-plugin must be in version 3.3 > (2) maven-project-info-reports-plugin in ve

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Promote flatten-maven-plugin out of the Sandbox

2014-03-31 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Mar 30, 2014 10:08 PM, "Jörg Hohwiller" wrote: > Hi there, > > I'd like to promote the flatten-maven-plugin out of the Sandbox > > Flatten Maven Plugin generates a flattened version of your pom.xml and > makes maven to install and deploy this one inste

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Julien Henry as committer

2014-03-31 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Mar 31, 2014 6:40 PM, "Simon Brandhof" wrote: > Hi, > > Julien would like to commit to the sonar plugin. He's a full-time > contributor to SonarQube and he's already aware about the development > process of Mojo projects. > > Any objection ? > His xirc

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release buildnumber-maven-plugin version 1.3

2014-04-28 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 binding, buildScmBranch is set correctly to master on two projects using git. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Baptiste Mathus

[mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin and site generation

2014-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I now tried to use the plugin for the first time and observed, that src/site/site.xml was not working anymore, e.g. the skin was not taken correctly. Is this expected? Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfrieden

Re: [mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin and site generation

2014-05-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Robert Scholte: > >> Hi Mirko, >> >> Asking the question already answers it :) >> The plugin should only change the pom.xml, not the MavenProject instance. >> So you're saying that the maven-site-plugin has trouble finding the >> site.xml? >> This re

Re: [mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin and site generation

2014-05-08 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello Jörg, > > I have a living example: > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/trivia/tree/with-flatten-maven-plugin > (please check out the with-flatten-maven-plugin branch), the java code > is in the java directory ;-) > > My environment: Oracl

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release flatten-maven-plugin version 1.0.0-beta-2

2014-06-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 from me. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 1.0.0-beta-2 of the flatt

[mojo-dev] MVERSIONS-258 Add mojo display-ancestors which will output the line of heritage for parent poms

2014-06-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Stephen, what do you think about adding this? I have already a working implementation at https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/branches/mfriedenhagen/versions-maven-plugin-display-ancestors with an IT and would like to merge this back to trunk. See svn diff https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: MVERSIONS-258 Add mojo display-ancestors which will output the line of heritage for parent poms

2014-06-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
ng versions of things against the available versions or updating > versions of things. > > > On 22 June 2014 21:22, Mirko Friedenhagen > wrote: > >> Hello Stephen, >> >> what do you think about adding this? I have already a working >> implementation at &

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: MVERSIONS-258 Add mojo display-ancestors which will output the line of heritage for parent poms

2014-06-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
I think it actually would suit perfectly in dependency:tree (esp when you >> consider that crazy people can and do put dependencies in parent projects >> in order to inject them into all children) >> >> On Sunday, 22 June 2014, Mirko Friedenhagen >> wrote: >> &g

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release FindBugs Maven Plugin version 3.0.0

2014-07-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1, checked with a multi module project. However I see that your staging repository holds the fimdbugs jar, not sure whether you are allowed to promote these to central. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release build-helper-maven-plugin 1.9.1

2014-09-04 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 1.9.1 of the build-helper-maven-plugin. >

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release mojo-parent version 34 and mojo-sandbox-parent version 15

2014-09-28 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Tony Chemit wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:16:57 +0200 > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > +1, > > To

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Please add me (mfriedenhagen) as well. I think our group is small enough to allow everyone full access for now. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Mar 20, 201

Re: [mojo-dev] Mailing list(s) new home

2015-04-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
l from my side. > > Joining maven dev will be a lot of traffic all together but is makes > perfectly sense... > > Regards > Jörg > > Am 09.04.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Mirko Friedenhagen: > > Hello, > > +1 for going with google groups, I do not like Ads and the list

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release JAXB2-Maven-Plugin version 2.0

2015-04-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello everyone, so what's the state right now. We have one -1 by Anders and obviously one +1 by Lennart. I do not know about the Eclipse problem but could imagine to resolve the logging issues in a later release. Having support for JDK8 is IMO more valuable then good logging or Eclipse integration

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Baptiste, first of all, thanks for your efforts, mind-boggling git-vodoo :-). One thing I noted (when inspecting the repository with SourceTree): * When I take a look at a repository which was git from the beginning, tags are modeled differently. Using the maven-release-plugin, they just are

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
/ On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello Baptiste, > > first of all, thanks for your efforts, mind-boggling git-vodoo :-). > One thing I noted (when inspecting the repository with SourceTree): > * When I take a look at a repository which was git from

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
s://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Thanks for reviewing Mirko, see below. > > 2015-05-02 23:45 GMT+02:00 Mirko Friedenhagen : >> >> Hello Baptiste, >> >> first of all, thanks for your efforts, mind-boggling git-

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
o see everything, either use gitk -all or gitk branchA > branchB > > 2015-05-03 11:37 GMT+02:00 Mirko Friedenhagen : > >> Hello Baptiste, >> >> >> you are right, there seem to be no real branches, so maybe it's just >> the SourceTree visualisation of the ta

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 from my side, the earlier the better. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 3, 2015 9:49 PM, "Baptiste Mathus" wrote: > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May.

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Deprecate/disable all ML of MOJO@Codehaus

2015-05-04 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Baptiste, nice E-Mail you prepared. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 4, 2015 10:31 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > On 5/4/15 10:16 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > >> I just drafted that for informing about the ML terminations: >> https://github.com/mojohaus/mo

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 from my side as well. Thanks for all the effort, Baptiste. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 15, 2015 10:58 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > yes go for it...Thanks... > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 5/15/15 10:53 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > >> OK, gu

[mojo-dev] Best way to submit a patch for ckjm-maven-plugin?

2011-10-11 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, this sandbox plugin never made it to a released version. Ages ago I did start to improve this plugin (my "fork" is hosted at https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ckjm-maven-plugin), sample output may be seen at http://huschteguzzel.de/hudson/job/ckjm-maven-plugin/site/ckjm.html. What would

Re: [mojo-dev] Best way to submit a patch for ckjm-maven-plugin?

2011-10-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 00:24, Wayne Fay wrote: >> this sandbox plugin never made it to a released version. Ages ago I > ... >> What would be the best way to get my changes back (I read >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/guidelines.html and several other >> pages. I could attach a patch to a

Re: [mojo-dev] Best way to submit a patch for ckjm-maven-plugin?

2011-10-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:58, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Mirko, > > would a snapshot release help? AFAIK that could be easily done > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > On 12.10.11 10:38, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: >> >> On Wed,

Re: [mojo-dev] [jira] Updated: (MOJO-1731) BanDuplicateClasses fails when there is a dependency of type pom

2011-10-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Oct 29, 2011 2:14 AM, "Ian Robertson (JIRA)" wrote: > > [ > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-2

2011-10-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko On Oct 29, 2011 1:17 AM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > +1 > > On 28 October 2011 19:46, Robert Scholte wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-2 of the extra-enforcer-rules > > Apache's Maven Enforcer Plugin is used to apply and enforce rules on your > > Mave

Re: RE: [mojo-dev] People looking for commit access...

2011-11-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
p and start vote threads >> >> for anyone on that list within the next 7 days, then I will reject the >> >> requests which do not have pending votes. >> >> >> >> SO PEOPLE START THE VOTE THREADS ALREADY >> >> >> >> ;-) >>

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Add Mirko Friedenhagen as a committer

2011-11-06 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Well, right now I am interested in the rules for the enforcer plugin (we have some company rules, which might easily established via regexes, e.g.) and progressing with the CKJM mojo :-) Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone On Nov 4, 2011 10:06 PM, "Jesse Glick" wrote: > I am not sure what subpr

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Add Mirko Friedenhagen as a committer

2011-11-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Thanks a lot :-). Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Nov 9, 2011 9:44 AM, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: > done > > 2011/11/9 Jesse Glick : > > Passed with 9 +1, congratulations! Could an

Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos

2011-11-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Anders, as all other sites (even for SNAPSHOTs of sandbox plugins) reside directly beneath mojo.codehaus.org and the site plugin replaces http://mojo.codehaus.org in links, you get: which should probably be ../../images/mojo_logo.png or /images/mojo_logo.png I just site-deployed the site

Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos

2011-11-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
le search? Also changed where >> publish date and version is displayed. >> >> /Anders >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 21:27, Mirko Friedenhagen >> wrote: >>> Hello Anders, >>> >>> as all other sites (even for SNAPSHOTs of sandb

Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos

2011-12-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
rs >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 21:47, Anders Hammar wrote: >>>> Right, I should have known that. I've been bit by that before. >>>> >>>> You've done some additional fluido skin config for the ckjm site, >>>> right? Added t

[mojo-dev] Tagging sandbox plugins?

2011-12-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, is it feasible to create a svn tag for a sandbox plugin? I know this may not be released officially, however even for an internal usage I would like to use a tagged version only. What would be an appropriate name for such a tag? Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexcep

[mojo-dev] Deletion of *all* tags in revision 15257?

2011-12-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, today I noticed that with revision 15257 most tags are gone in SVN probably by accident: [mifr@LWKA-HGP2H4J workspace]$ svn log -c 15257 -v http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/ r15257 | soelvpil | 2011-11-22 12:00:46 +0100 (

Re: [mojo-dev] Deletion of *all* tags in revision 15257?

2011-12-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
, Stephen Connolly wrote: > yeah we can and should > > - Stephen > > --- > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense > words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the > screen > > On 9 Dec 2011 14:59, "Mirk

[mojo-dev] New version of the versions-maven-plugin

2011-12-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello everybody, looking at http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11830&version=16444 and http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11830&version=17251 there are two dangling releases for this plugin, while the current one is quite old (1.5 years). What is m

Re: [mojo-dev] New version of the versions-maven-plugin

2011-12-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
a number of people > > -Stephen > > On 9 December 2011 17:05, Mirko Friedenhagen > wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > looking at > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11830&version=16444 > > and > http://jira.codehaus.org/se

[mojo-dev] RFC: enforcer-rule to check that a property does *not* match a specific regex.

2011-12-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello everybody, in my company we have a set of archetypes where the developer should replace entries in the POM immediately (e.g. the scm or the developer section). These entries are marked with TODO. Now I already tried to accomplish an enforcer-rule which should ensure that some properties do n

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Maven FindBugs Plugin version 2.4.0

2012-01-17 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 I ran this version on a couple of local projects. Regards Mirko On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 17:37, LeClaire Garvin wrote: > Hi, > > > I'd like to release version 2.4.0 of the Maven FindBugs Plugin > > FindBugs looks for bugs in Java programs. It is based on the concept of bug > patterns. A bug pa

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Mojo's Versions Maven Plugin version 1.3

2012-01-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1, tried this on a couple of local projects, worked flawlessly. Regards Mirko On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 18:12, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Folks, > > It has been a little while since the last release of > versions-maven-plugin, a number of important issues have been resolved > and I would like to

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Mojo's Versions Maven Plugin version 1.3

2012-01-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
-maven-plugin are given in mojo-parent which is the parent of mojo-sandbox-parent which is the parent of stage2-maven-plugin, so they are defined but reported as warnings? Regards Mirko On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 21:19, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > +1, tried this on a couple of local projects, wor

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Mojo's Versions Maven Plugin version 1.3 (take 2)

2012-02-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (tested on a couple of local projects), the error I reported before is gone. Regards Mirko On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 22:59, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Folks, > > It has been a little while since the last release of > versions-maven-plugin, a number of important issues have been resolved > and I

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Promote CodeNarc Maven Plugin out of the Sandbox

2012-03-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 15:15, LeClaire Garvin wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to promote the CodeNarc Maven Plugin out of the Sandbox > > PROJECT_DESCRIPTION > > Co

[mojo-dev] Feature branch: Best way to develop new features?

2012-03-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, when I wanted to contribute to the "Extra Enforcer Rules" e.g., what is the preferred way? Doing the work directly in trunk or is it better to branch and merge the complete feature afterwards, so the trunk is always stable? Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https:

Re: [mojo-dev] Feature branch: Best way to develop new features?

2012-03-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 21:13, Robert Scholte wrote: > Always assume that the trunk can be released any moment. > So if you're not sure if you can finish it within a couple of days, just > branch it. > Or develop it on your own system and don't commit it yet ;) Not committing is like committing s

[mojo-dev] extra-enforcer-rules: new rule requirePropertyDiverges

2012-03-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I have implemented a new rule requirePropertyDiverges in a branch (https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/branches/mfriedenhagen/extra-enforcer-rules), added unit tests, an integration test and a description (http://huschteguzzel.de/hudson/job/extra-enforcer-rules/doclinks/1/requirePropertyDiverges.

Re: [mojo-dev] extra-enforcer-rules: new rule requirePropertyDiverges

2012-03-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
ne). > > -Robert > > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:49:37 +0100, Mirko Friedenhagen > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have implemented a new rule requirePropertyDiverges in a branch >> >> (https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/branches/mfriedenhagen/extra-enforcer-rules)

Re: [mojo-dev] extra-enforcer-rules: new rule requirePropertyDiverges

2012-03-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
n Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 23:37, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello Robert, > > actually I did not know how to get the parent's property. As well I > was thinking of the following constellation: > > company:superpom > company.project1:parent-pom (overrides project.url from

Re: [mojo-dev] extra-enforcer-rules: new rule requirePropertyDiverges

2012-03-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hi Mirko, > > I've just verified with help:evaluate that you could do the following: > compare ${project.scm.url} with ${project.parent.scm.url} > If these values are the same, your rule should fail. > > -Robert > > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:00:00 +0100, Mirko Fr

Re: [mojo-dev] Updating development guidelines (MOJO-1654)

2012-04-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, while we are at this, it would come quit handy when the cobertura report would render XML as well, so CI systems are able to pick up the values :-). In regards to changes from JIRA: Every non trivial change should come with a corresponding JIRA issue then, right? My only concern here wou

Re: [mojo-dev] RE: [mojo-scm] [16307] branches/mfriedenhagen/extra-enforcer-rules/src: Documentation for new rule requireRoles.

2012-04-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
; (16306 => 16307) > > --- > branches/mfriedenhagen/extra-enforcer-rules/src/site/apt/requirePropertyDiverges.apt.vm >2012-04-09 > 19:48:06 UTC (rev 16306) > +++ > branches/mfriedenhagen/extra-enforcer-rules/src/site/apt/requirePropertyDiverges.apt.vm >2012-

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Releasing Wagon Maven Plugin 1.0-beta-4

2012-04-10 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Dan, I get the following (Profile codehaus-pre just defines your staging repository as pluginRepository) : --- snip --- [mifr@LWKA-HGP2H4J ws]$ mvn -U -Pcodehaus-pre org.codehaus.mojo:wagon-maven-plugin:1.0-beta-4:list -Dwagon.url=http://p eople.apache.org/~olamy/staging-repo Picked up JAVA

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Releasing Wagon Maven Plugin 1.0-beta-4

2012-04-10 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
happens on beta-3. > > So I dont consider it is a regression > > Please file a JIRA for this finding. > > Thanks > > -D > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen > wrote: >> Hello Dan, >> >> I get the following (Profile cod

[mojo-dev] New release of extra-enforcer-rules?

2012-04-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I have merged back my branch into the trunk which implements three new rules for checking diverging properties from an ancestor project as well as rules for checking certain roles for developers and contributors are defined in a project. I have written unit tests as well as invoker tests an

Re: [mojo-dev] New release of extra-enforcer-rules?

2012-04-19 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Robert, a) maybe the intentions of RequireContributorRoles and RequireDeveloperRoles are not clear: - I did not want every developer or contributor to *have a role*, but that certain roles are taken in a project, so the code checks that at least one of the developers/contributors in a proje

Re: [mojo-dev] New release of extra-enforcer-rules?

2012-04-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
ifferent object, but now I >> see >> public class Developer extends Contributor >> That part could be reverted, although it looks a bit weird. >> >> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:13:51 +0200, Mirko Friedenhagen >> wrote: >> >> > Hello Robert, >

Re: [mojo-dev] New release of extra-enforcer-rules?

2012-04-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
y, so I think you shouldn't use Required as prefix, >> but maybe AllowedContributorRoles. >> >> I assumed that contributors and developers are different object, but now I >> see >> public class Developer extends Contributor >> That part could be reverted, although

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-3

2012-04-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hi, I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-3 of the extra-enforcer-rules Apache's Maven Enforcer Plugin is used to apply and enforce rules on your Maven projects. The Enforcer plugin ships with a set of standard rules The Mojo project hosts this project to provide extra rules which are not part of

[mojo-dev] Re: [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-3

2012-04-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 from me obviously :-). Regards Mirko On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 20:47, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-3 of the extra-enforcer-rules > > Apache's Maven Enforcer Plugin is used to apply and enforce rules on > your Maven pro

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-3

2012-04-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, the vote passed with +3, so I proceed the release process. Regards Mirko On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 19:02, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > -- > Olivier > > Le 24 avr. 2012 20:49, "Mirko Friedenhagen" a > écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> I'

[mojo-dev] [ANN] extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-3 Released

2012-04-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hi, The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of the extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-alpha-3. Apache's Maven Enforcer Plugin is used to apply and enforce rules on your Maven projects. The Enforcer plugin ships with a set of standard rules The Mojo project hosts this project to provide ext

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release JDiff-maven-plugin version 1.0-beta-1

2012-04-28 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Robert, I tried this on one of my pet projects (https://github.com/1and1/testlink-junit) and besides the MRELEASE-723 issue (I named the tags @groupId@-@version@ as this is a multimodule project and the artifactId does not make sense in this situation), I think the plugin will fail on multi-

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] [CANCELED] Release JDiff-maven-plugin version 1.0-beta-1

2012-04-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Robert, Done: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJDIFF-11 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:47, Robert Scholte wrote: > > Good catches, so I'll drop this attempt. >

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Voting should not be a requirement for patch releases

2012-05-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
-1 I agree with Javier that something shorter than 72h may lead to more bugs. Regards Mirko On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Javier Murciego wrote: > Hi all > > In my opinion, if it is very easy to publish new versions, you > may, unintentionally,paying less attention to the software and to > in

[mojo-dev] JIRA not reachable because it was updated to JIRA 5

2012-05-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, right now I am not able to access JIRA as the license is not valid for JIRA 5. Who should be contacted to resolve this? Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] IDLJ Maven Plugin version 1.1.1

2012-06-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Russel, when I follow the link to the release notes I get the release notes from the findbugs-maven-plugin 2.5 :-). Regards Mirko On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > +1 > > I can't verify the functionality of the plugin, because I don't have enough > knowledge about id

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] IDLJ Maven Plugin version 1.1.1

2012-06-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Checked out the release, ran "mvn clean install -Prun-its" and this looked good. Regards Mirko On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello Russel, > > when I follow the link to the release notes I get the release notes > from the fin

Re: [mojo-dev] Patch page for contributions through GIT

2012-06-18 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
I see svn has "svn patch" as well, so when you have Tortoise installed, you should be able to invoke this as well .-). Regards Mirko On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Right, let me rephrase that: > I've been spoiled with Windows and use both Eclipse and Tortoise* to do al

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Maven FindBugs Plugin version 2.5.1

2012-06-26 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 tested general functionality with one of my pet projects. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Jun 24, 2012 1:38 PM, "LeClaire Garvin" wrote: > Hi, > > > I'd like to release vers

Re: [mojo-dev] [ANN] buildnumber-maven-project version 1.2 released

2012-10-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Benson, did you already push this to central? I did not see a vote either? Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > The Mojo team i

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Mojo's Versions Maven Plugin version 2.0

2012-11-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1, tested versions:update-properties and versions:use-latest-releases. Regards Mirko On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Folks, > > It has been a little while since the last release of > versions-maven-plugin, a number of important issues have been resolved > and I would

Re: [mojo-dev] What to do about ${parent.groupId} a.k.a. MVERSIONS-200

2012-11-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
I agree with Robert on this, plugins should take part in the deprecation process, users should just fix their POMs (or force their build engineers to fix the parent POMs) and the DeprecatedExpressionException is a good idea as well. Regards Mirko On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Robert Scholte

Re: [mojo-dev] MOJO-1909 : doc issue ?

2013-03-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Baptiste, * You are quite right, accepted would be much better than expected. * It is not optionalRoles, but the intention was that you may provide roles which are accepted additionally, i.e. the union of requiredRoles and validRoles are allowed (so may additionalValidRoles would have been a

  1   2   3   >