Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - Appassembler Maven Plugin version 1.3.1

2013-04-04 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2013/4/4 Karl Heinz Marbaise > Hello all, > > I'd like release version 1.3.1 of the appassembler-maven-plugin which > contains a few new features and primarily bug fixes > > The Application Assembler Plugin is a Maven plugin for generating > scripts for starting java applications. > All depe

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Migrate mojo from subversion to git

2013-07-23 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2013/7/23 Stephen Connolly > 0: I'm not currently bothered either way > > > On 23 July 2013 14:19, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The following vote is a first (baby) step to keep us moving after our >> recent discussion about this. >> >> *Just checking here nobody is against moving

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Retire JBoss Maven Plugin

2013-09-07 Thread David Karlsen
+1 Den 6. sep. 2013 21:55 skrev "Robert Scholte" følgende: > Hi, > > it seems like JBoss is maintaining its own JBoss Maven plugin [1] > Having a look the goals of both plugin[2][3] I see several equivalent > goals, but both plugins also have their own goals. > In general I prefer to let the deve

Re: [mojo-dev] sonar 2.2 plugin?

2013-11-22 Thread David Karlsen
tml > > > 2013/11/21 David Karlsen > >> Where is it? >> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/sonar-maven-plugin/ >> http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/sonar-maven-plugin-2.2/ >> >> >> -- >> -- >> David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linke

Re: [mojo-dev] appassembler-maven-plugin releases 1.7.1 ?

2013-12-14 Thread David Karlsen
Sounds good. +1 14. des. 2013 14:01 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" følgende: > Hi, > > I would like to start a release as soon as possible...the current list > contains 5 solved issues which might be enough for a new release in my > opinion (1.7.1) ..what do you think? Any objections? > > Mit freund

Re: [mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-131) JDK 8 Support

2014-05-05 Thread David Karlsen
Lennart: Should we roll a vote or do you want something else to go into the release. I think our two fixes should do it: r19687 | lennartj | 2014-04-28 08:25:58 +0200 (Mon, 28 Apr 2014) | 2 lines [MASPECTJ-132] Upgrade to

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSSION] Switching plugins to MIT license

2014-09-06 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2014-09-06 19:42 GMT+02:00 Jörg Hohwiller : > Hi there, > > In order to change the license of the source-code of an open-source > project the official procedure is that all authors that contributed > (reasonable) to the code give their agreement (potentially by signature). > This is especial

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2014-09-09 18:23 GMT+02:00 Lennart Jörelid : > Hi all, > > I'd like to release version 1.7 of the AspectJ Maven Plugin, which > contains updates > to the internal AspectJ toolset and several bug fixes. > > The AspectJ-Maven-Plugin weaves AspectJ aspects into your classes > using the AspectJ co

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-02-27 Thread David Karlsen
Codehaus.org does not respond - already EOL? ;) The choises seem sane - except for sticking with svn. git svn and pointing to the correct places for tags and branches should make it possible to convert each module into a git repo (and use github for hosting). 2015-02-27 10:24 GMT+01:00 Baptiste M

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-19 Thread David Karlsen
And me. github id: davidkarlsen codehaus id: david 14. mars 2015 14:11 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" : > Hi Hervé, > > On 3/14/15 1:43 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus >> (and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo >> project" on >> our websi

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2015-05-03 21:48 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus : > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to put the SVN in RO > m

[mojo-dev] Re: maven support

2011-08-21 Thread David Karlsen
lk about uploading the > delta pack, but I am not clear how this would look inside of the maven > repository. Do you have an example of what 3.2.3 looks like? Sorry > if I missed it. > > Sincerely, > Leif Mortenson > Tanuki Software, Ltd. > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] move back github stuff to codehaus

2011-08-29 Thread David Karlsen
I would imagine that the sources are equally hard/easy to find whereever they reside - as long as the references are correct (documentation, pom scm etc). Having said that I'm really pro-git and hope we at least can use codehaus git. It's fast - and it's a lot easier to collaborate with push and p

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] move back github stuff to codehaus

2011-08-29 Thread David Karlsen
I'm in favour for the voting (waiting 3 days is no crisis) - and often people find stuff I've not found yet. I also see your point about access control. So I guess a good middle way would be to use git hosted at the Haus. 2011/8/29 Christopher Hunt > On 30/08/2011, at 4:09 AM, Jesse McConnell w

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Javier Murciego as commiter] WAS: [mojo-dev] Commiter access

2011-08-30 Thread David Karlsen
gt; wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I'd like to get commiter access to Codehaus Mojo, in > > order to colaborate on > > > WAS6 plugins. I've been collaborating with David > > Karlsen solving bugs > > > through a copy of WAS6 plugin on github > >

[mojo-dev] Re: [VOTE] Javier Murciego as commiter] WAS: [mojo-dev] Commiter access

2011-09-04 Thread David Karlsen
s you may have. Check http://codehaus.org/ - and follow that to enroll through Xircles. 2011/8/31 David Karlsen > Nothing really reached my repo. > Javier have been working on some local patches. > I've locked myself out from the codehaus (I've changed email address - and &g

Re: [mojo-dev] Renewal of despots

2011-10-24 Thread David Karlsen
I wouldn't mind - but haven't been working on the infrastructure. Haven't been very active lately - but that's because my box went down which was receiving mail to the davidkarlsen.com domain - thus I couldn't recover my pw. If somebody could switch the mailaddress to davidkarl...@gmail.com for the

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release mojo-parent version 29 and mojo-sandbox-parent 10

2011-11-19 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2011/11/19 Tony Chemit : > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 29 of the mojo-parent and version 10 of the > mojo-sandbox-parent. > > These releases contain severals issues fixed and a lot of updates of > maven-plugins and libs (MOJO-1765) > > MOJO-1664 Incorrect repository definitions in mojo-

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release mojo-parent version 29 and mojo-sandbox-parent 10 (take 2)

2011-11-20 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2011/11/20 Tony Chemit : > Hi, > > Second take with fixed stuff :) > > I'd like to release version 29 of the mojo-parent and version 10 of the > mojo-sandbox-parent. > > These releases contain severals issues fixed and a lot of updates of > maven-plugins and libs (MOJO-1765) > > MOJO-1664 Incor

Re: [mojo-dev] Continious Integration System for the mojo maven plugins

2011-12-23 Thread David Karlsen
There used to be a job running on Sonatype's server as well as bamboo. Den 23. des. 2011 17:13 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" følgende: > Hi, > > i just wanted to know if there exist a CI system (like Jenkins, Hudson or > whatever) for the plugins in the mojo area? > > I configured temporarily the a

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Options for dealing with inactive projects (was Re: Project status)

2011-12-26 Thread David Karlsen
I added myself as maintainer of the axistools-maven-plugin plugin because I'm unfortunately stuck with some RPC encoded services. I don't expect much activity as axis 1 isn't maintained any longer and RPC based services are old school now. I updated http://irc.codehaus.org/display/MOJO/Plugin+reass

Re: [mojo-dev] [jira] (MAPPASM-119) @BASEDIR@ no longer gets expanded to $BASEDIR or %BASEDIR% in "extraJvmArguments" tag

2011-12-27 Thread David Karlsen
Hi Karl - nice to see some work on this plugin again. Will you address https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAPPASM-121 https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAPPASM-128 https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAPPASM-124 as well? 2011/12/27 Karl Heinz Marbaise (JIRA) : > >     [ > https://jira.codehaus.org/bro

Re: [mojo-dev] appassembler-plugin - beta Release ?

2012-01-05 Thread David Karlsen
Any chance of aqueezing in: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAPPASM-124 https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAPPASM-121 as well? 2012/1/5 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi to you, > > based on the changes/fixes i've made to the appassembler i would like to > start with first steps into the wild...Huh... >

Re: [mojo-dev] Project status

2012-01-17 Thread David Karlsen
The axistools-maven-plugin should not be present in the last list as it has a maintainer (me). 2012/1/16 Robert Scholte > ** > Final attempt:status of > http://irc.codehaus.org/display/MOJO/Plugin+reassignments > > Plugins with activities within the last year > > This is the set of plugins tha

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Versions Maven Plugin 1.3.1 (take 2)

2012-02-03 Thread David Karlsen
+1 (binding) 2012/2/3 Stephen Connolly : > Folks, > > The only changes from 1.3 are: > * the replacement fo StringBuilder with StringBuffer. > * the extra safety from a NPE in display-plugin-updates > > A short 24h vote for this version given the minor change. > > We solved 2 issues: > http://jira

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] was6-maven-plugin 1.2

2012-05-29 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2012/5/30 Olivier Lamy : > +1 > > 2012/5/28 Javier Murciego : >> Sorry, I forgot to close the staging repository. >> >> It's https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-091/ >> >> Regards >> >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: >>> >>> no staging reposito

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] APT Maven Plugin 1.0-alpha-5

2012-07-22 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2012/7/20 Russell Gold : > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-5 of the apt Maven Plugin. > > Release notes: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11062&version=16759 > > We fixed two issues > > Release Notes - Mojo - Version apt-maven-plugin-1.0-alpha-5

Re: [mojo-dev] release of Mojo AppAssembler Plugin 1.3 ?

2012-09-07 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2012/9/7 Olivier Lamy : > Hi, > Any plan for a new release ? > If no I will probably volunteer for that :-) > > Thanks > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > ---

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - Appassembler Maven Plugin version 1.3

2012-09-09 Thread David Karlsen
+1 - worked OK for me 2012/9/9 Dan Tran : > Hello all, > > > I'd like release version 1.3 of the appassembler-maven-plugin which > contains new features and bug fixes > > The Application Assembler Plugin is a Maven plugin for generating > scripts for starting java applications. > All dependencies

[mojo-dev] Lost account

2011-05-21 Thread David Karlsen
Hi - the box for my domain crashed - and my new address is davidkarl...@gmail.com - the old was da...@davidkarlsen.com. Could somebody change the address for my account to the new email address? Trygis: You could maybe confirm that I am still the same user? I'd like to get back and commit a few f

[mojo-dev] annotations processors

2011-06-27 Thread David Karlsen
Hi. There are currently three annotations processors - but none of them work "perfectly": http://maven-annotation-plugin.googlecode.com/svn/docs/process-mojo.html http://mojo.codehaus.org/apt-maven-plugin/ and the main compiler plugin: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/compile