Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-05 Thread Julien HENRY
Hi Baptiste, I guess you are using an old SVN export but just to be sure is it expected that some recent commits are missing? Appart from that all look good (tags, branches, ...). Thanks Julien De : Baptiste Mathus À : "dev@mojo.codehaus.org" Envoyé le : Lundi 4 mai 2015 22h26 Objet :

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-05 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Yes, the dump we have is from 20150407. 2015-05-05 9:07 GMT+02:00 Julien HENRY : > Hi Baptiste, > > I guess you are using an old SVN export but just to be sure is it expected > that some recent commits are missing? > > Appart from that all look good (tags, branches, ...). > > Thanks > > Julien >

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-285) Goal set:version fails if groupId is defined in parent pom

2015-05-05 Thread Stephan Krull (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Stephan Krull commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-285) Goal set:version fails if groupId is defined in parent pom

2015-05-05 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Karl Heinz Marbaise updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-285) Goal set:version fails if groupId is defined in parent pom

2015-05-05 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Karl Heinz Marbaise commented on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Deprecate/disable all ML of MOJO@Codehaus

2015-05-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi, > > So, as a followup with the upcoming Codehaus shutdown, to go forward and try > to attract attention to those who may have missed the other quite verbose > threads . > > Let's > > Vote open for 72h max (don't know if we could/shou

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-05 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 -- Dennis Lundberg Den 3 maj 2015 21:49 skrev "Baptiste Mathus" : > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-05 Thread Baptiste Mathus
OK, it's now been 48h (not yet 72h), but as the vote seems to be overwhelmingly going towards the +1, I guess we can save some time and declare this vote passed in those particular circumstances. I'm gonna ask now Ben to put the repo in RO mode and ask for the dump (we can revert that anyway in th

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-05 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Baptiste, On 5/5/15 9:59 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: OK, it's now been 48h (not yet 72h), but as the vote seems to be overwhelmingly going towards the +1, I guess we can save some time and declare this vote passed in those particular circumstances. Yes please do so... Kind regards Karl Hein