Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Thanks for reviewing Mirko, see below. 2015-05-02 23:45 GMT+02:00 Mirko Friedenhagen : > Hello Baptiste, > > first of all, thanks for your efforts, mind-boggling git-vodoo :-). > One thing I noted (when inspecting the repository with SourceTree): > * When I take a look at a repository which was g

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Baptiste, you are right, there seem to be no real branches, so maybe it's just the SourceTree visualisation of the tags which look like branches. Or maybe it is because in line 107 you only push the master branch as far as I understand it? I just play around with "git push --all origin", se

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Mirko, which version of Git do you use? i can do a git tag and get the following output: $ git tag extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-1 extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-2 extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-3 extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4 extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-5 extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-bet

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Jaxb2-Maven-Plugin version 2.1

2015-05-03 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Hi all, I'd like to release version 2.1 of the JAXB2 Maven Plugin, which is a major plugin upgrade that contains rewritten plugin mechanics, updates to the JAXB2 toolset and several bug fixes. The 2.x versions of the plugin are not backwards compatible with the 1.x versions. The JAXB2-Maven-Plugi

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Baptiste Mathus
In that situation you should use gitk --tags because the corresponding commits are actually not part of the master branch. As indeed they will be in the future. Actually, gitk only shows the history of the current branch. So in general when you want to see everything, either use gitk -all or gitk

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, first of all thanks for the hints how to use these tools. I just find it unfortunate that you have to use specific options to standard tooling to see a meaningful history where I may easily see the tags. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 3, 2015 11:58 AM, "Baptiste Mathus" wrot

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Hi, As the deadline is coming close, and the migration script seems to work, I'd like to *propose we ask Codehaus support to put our svn in readonly mode and provide us with an up-to-date dump.* I'm gonna start a dedicated vote for it to make sure everyone sees it. 2015-05-03 13:44 GMT+02:00 Mir

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Hi all, As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and move on. Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to put the SVN in RO mode. This vote will be open for 72h and will NOT succeed by laz

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 from my side, the earlier the better. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 3, 2015 9:49 PM, "Baptiste Mathus" wrote: > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May.

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2015-05-03 21:48 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus : > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to put the SVN in RO > m

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Lennart Jörelid
+1. I am looking forward to the Git era. :) 2015-05-03 21:48 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus : > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to as

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Dan Tran
+1 Big thanks for doing this ... -Dan On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:52 PM, David Karlsen wrote: > +1 > > 2015-05-03 21:48 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus : > >> Hi all, >> >> As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and >> move on. >> Indeed, the announcement says services shou

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Baptiste, +1 from me... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 5/3/15 9:48 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: Hi all, As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and move on. Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. So, to go forward, I'd like to

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Anders Hammar
+1 /Anders (mobile) Den 3 maj 2015 21:49 skrev "Baptiste Mathus" : > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to pu

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Arnaud Héritier
There is no release in progress it seems, thus+1 let's go. On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi, > > As the deadline is coming close, and the migration script seems to work, > I'd like to *propose we ask Codehaus support to put our svn in readonly > mode and provide us wi

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to put the SV

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Rickard von Essen
+1 On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Baptiste Mathus > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and >> move on. >> Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Tony Chemit
On Sun, 3 May 2015 21:48:41 +0200 Baptiste Mathus wrote: Let'ss go! :) +1 Good work Batman. tony. > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and move > on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forw

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On 4 May 2015 at 05:48, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to put the SVN in RO

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-03 Thread Milos Kleint
+1 Milos On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi all, > > As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and > move on. > Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. > > So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus support to put

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-05-03 Thread Anders Hammar
> There is no release in progress it seems, thus+1 > let's go. > There is a release of the jaxb2 mojo in progress. /Anders > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Baptiste Mathus > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As the deadline is coming close, and the migration script seems to work, >> I'd like to *prop