[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-129) Mojo params have incorrectly stated 'since' values

2015-04-29 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-51) Stale detection does not see that one more schema file has been added to build

2015-04-29 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid commented on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] Releasing a Mojo plugin nowadays...?

2015-04-29 Thread Lennart Jörelid
The 2.0 release was cancelled, and since some features were added and some code was refactored in the plugin I felt it better to release version 2.1 instead. If someone who actually uses Eclipse feels like pinpointing the problem with why the m2e descriptor below does not work with the 2.x branch,

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-129) Mojo params have incorrectly stated 'since' values

2015-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] Releasing a Mojo plugin nowadays...?

2015-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar
As I earlier stated, after some investigation, there is some other change in the code that causes this to stop functioning. It worked in v1.x, but after your refactoring it doesn't any more. IMHO it's very unfortunate to just ignore such a key feature for anyone on Eclipse, especially as it worked

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-51) Stale detection does not see that one more schema file has been added to build

2015-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-97) mjaxb-14 fails when running under JDK 8

2015-04-29 Thread Marek Winkler (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Marek Winkler commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-129) Mojo params have incorrectly stated 'since' values

2015-04-29 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-129) Mojo params have incorrectly stated 'since' values

2015-04-29 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid edited a comment on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-51) Stale detection does not see that one more schema file has been added to build

2015-04-29 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid updated an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] Releasing a Mojo plugin nowadays...?

2015-04-29 Thread Lennart Jörelid
I am somewhat split about the concept of doing special development within a Maven plugin project to support any of the IDEs in the development community. An IDE claiming a tooling integration with Maven ought to be able to use the POM and the plugin descriptors out of the box. This seems certainly

[mojo-dev] Mojo release mechanics?

2015-04-29 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Hello all, Is the process described at http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/performing-a-release.html still valid for release? -- -- +==+ | Bästa hälsningar, | [sw. "Best regards"] | | Lennart Jörelid | EAI Architect & Integrator | | jGuru Europe AB | Mölnlycke - K

[mojo-dev] [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Mojo Versions Maven Plugin version 2.2

2015-04-29 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
The vote has passed by lazy consensus. I'll continue with the release. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 4/25/15 10:13 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, I'd like to release version 2.2 of the Versions Maven Plugin We solved 19 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro

Re: [mojo-dev] Mojo release mechanics?

2015-04-29 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Yes. If Codehaus hasn't started to disable some of those things. But Nexus@Codehaus is supposed to stay longer, and that's the main part of the release, that should be OK. Try mvn site-deploy on the site project for example to test you're still allowed to deploy the maven site. Don't really know

Re: [mojo-dev] Mojo release mechanics?

2015-04-29 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Thanks, Baptiste. :) I'll go ahead and start the release. 2015-04-29 21:43 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus : > Yes. If Codehaus hasn't started to disable some of those things. > But Nexus@Codehaus is supposed to stay longer, and that's the main part > of the release, that should be OK. > > Try mvn si

Re[2]: [mojo-dev] Releasing a Mojo plugin nowadays...?

2015-04-29 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Hi Lennart, I often curse the day when I out of good will decided to support M2E in my Maven plugin (I am a happy user of IntelliJ IDEA), but hopefully my experience helps you. Note that in M2E prior to 1.5 there was a major classloading issue, which broke quite a few plugins. I took a look a

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MRPM-183) Configurable rpmbuild command temp space

2015-04-29 Thread Dan Tran (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Dan Tran updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MRPM-183) Configurable rpmbuild command temp space

2015-04-29 Thread Dan Tran (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Dan Tran created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MRPM-183) Configurable rpmbuild command temp space

2015-04-29 Thread Dan Tran (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Dan Tran updated an issue

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] Releasing a Mojo plugin nowadays...?

2015-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar
Technically there is no need for 1) and 2) to make it m2e compatible. The jaxb2 plugin used to be m2e compatible through 3) and a home-grown staleness check instead of 1) and 2). /Anders On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Sergei Ivanov wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > I often curse the day when I out of

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-51) Stale detection does not see that one more schema file has been added to build

2015-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-129) Mojo params have incorrectly stated 'since' values

2015-04-29 Thread Anders Hammar (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue