Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-04-12 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi there, (mail was stuck in outbox - sorry for delay) sounds great. I am a big fan of the github platform. In that case we should also discuss if we create one repo for each MOJO instead of having one for all as we currently have in SVN (what actually sucks). Then only the core maintainers of eac

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-04-12 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi there, I do have permissions yet and PR seems overkill: joerg.hohwiller - that is me. Full name: Jörg Hohwiller Email: jo...@j-hohwiller.de (or hohwi...@users.sourceforge.net) Github account: https://github.com/hohwille Thanks Jörg Am 08.04.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Baptiste Mathus: > The file

Re: [mojo-dev] Sources migration to GitHub (was: [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-04-12 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi, plan sounds great. +1 do you already have a (rough) roadmap/schedule? When should we stop working in SVN, wenn will the Git repos be available? Thanks Jörg Am 08.04.2015 um 09:03 schrieb Baptiste Mathus: > > Forking the thread to focus around Git tinkering. > > FWIW, some of you already n

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-04-12 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi there, I guess jira export is not the problem. GH support for automated import will be more of a challange. In the worst case we will lose all old issues... Creating issues via Web-API is possible with some scripting but "faking" authors and dates will IMHO not work this way... Regards Jörg

Re: [mojo-dev] Mailing list(s) new home

2015-04-12 Thread Jörg Hohwiller
Hi, +1 for that as well from my side. Joining maven dev will be a lot of traffic all together but is makes perfectly sense... Regards Jörg Am 09.04.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Mirko Friedenhagen: > > Hello, > > +1 for going with google groups, I do not like Ads and the list search > is really impor