Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-01 Thread Dan Tran
Apache process may send some new potential committers away :) +1 for Github, but stay together under on umbrella of org.code.mojo groupId. -D btw, i found this https://github.com/codehaus-plexus so we may something similar like that? On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Tony Chemit wrote: > O

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Cobertura Maven Plugin version 2.7

2015-03-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, We'll need that later on as well, so I'd like to keep it there. I'll remove the todo. Den 28 feb 2015 21:12 skrev "Grzegorz Slowikowski" : > Hi > > I found this: > > > > ossrh > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ > > false >

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Cobertura Maven Plugin version 2.7

2015-03-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Dan, Could you file a JIRA issue for that. Not tools do byte code engineering, so that might have something to do with you problem. Den 1 mar 2015 08:23 skrev "Dan Tran" : > I have a number of internal projects which use aspectj-maven-plugin-1.7 + > java 8. they work with c-m-p-2.6, but fail

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Cobertura Maven Plugin version 2.7

2015-03-01 Thread Dan Tran
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-199 On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Could you file a JIRA issue for that. Not tools do byte code engineering, > so that might have something to do with you problem. > Den 1 mar 2015 08:23 skrev "Dan Tran" : > > I h

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MCOBERTURA-199) Not working with aspectj

2015-03-01 Thread Dan Tran (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Dan Tran created an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release JAXB2-Maven-Plugin version 2.0

2015-03-01 Thread Anders Hammar
Lennart, Just want to let you know that I looked into this and can't see why it doesn't work. There are some changes though in the code. I'm swamped with other things right know so I will not be able to look more into this currently. It should be easy to test though by just downloading an Eclipse

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Move the shitty-maven-plugin to the Graveyard

2015-03-01 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a formal vote. That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to the mojo's graveyard. [ ] +1 : deprecate it [ ] 0 : don't care [ ] -1: don't move it, i think it's still useful This vote will be open for at lea

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Move the shitty-maven-plugin to the Graveyard

2015-03-01 Thread Anders Hammar
+1 /Anders On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a > formal vote. > > That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to the > mojo's graveyard. > > [ ] +1 : deprecate it > [ ] 0 : don't care