Title: Message Title
Anders Hammar commented on an issue
Title: Message Title
Julien HENRY assigned an issue to Fabrice Bellingard
Title: Message Title
Alexander Kriegisch commented on an issue
The real issue here is that project creation requires full admin on JIRA,
and Ben will only give that to:
1. People he trusts;
2. People who send him beers; or
3. People who he can fire USB controlled nerf missiles at.
(I only got admin because I fall into the last category)
I am quite sure Ben
Hi all,
I'd like to release version 1.7 of the AspectJ Maven Plugin, which contains
updates
to the internal AspectJ toolset and several bug fixes.
The AspectJ-Maven-Plugin weaves AspectJ aspects into your classes
using the AspectJ compiler ("ajc").
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/se
Hi,
>
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11781&version=19839
Jira looks good now...
Staging Repositories:
General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/
Exclusive:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/SOME_SPECIFIC_STAGING_
WRT the staging repository, simply use the "general" link, or the
"specific" below:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/1.7/
2014-09-10 12:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise :
> Hi,
>
> >
>
>> We solved 7 issues:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secu
Hi,
On 9/10/14 12:57 PM, Lennart Jörelid wrote:
WRT the staging repository, simply use the "general" link, or the
"specific" below:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/1.7/
Ah...sorry I was on the wrong nexusbut it would be better to pu
I don't think this is sufficient in general, because one may want to check
if nothing else than the plugin artifact itself chimed into the staging
repo, and then would be synced to Central when voted one. I was not there
at the time, but I suppose that's one of the reason the template has the
speci
Bon Jour, Baptiste.
I simply missed pasting the explicit (version-specfic) link to the staging
repository of the a-m-p version 1.7 into the vote email,
but I agree with you that it should be done in general.
Do we feel it is OK to proceed with the release vote, since the specific
repository link
No need to respin IMO as the correct info is in the mail thread.
/Anders (mobile)
Den 10 sep 2014 14:24 skrev "Lennart Jörelid" :
> Bon Jour, Baptiste.
>
> I simply missed pasting the explicit (version-specfic) link to the staging
> repository of the a-m-p version 1.7 into the vote email,
> but I
No need to respin since the release has not been found flawed in itself. I
was just reacting for the general case of why that information is indeed
needed.
Cheers and thanks a lot for the work on that release.
2014-09-10 14:24 GMT+02:00 Lennart Jörelid :
> Bon Jour, Baptiste.
>
> I simply missed
- test/build from tag using one of internal project uses aspectj
- build from tag on windows to validate windows IT
- build from source tar ball fails on windows + linux
---
T E S T S
---
Run
Title: Message Title
Artem Oboturov updated an issue
Title: Message Title
Artem Oboturov commented on an issue
Title: Message Title
Jigar Joshi created an issue
Title: Message Title
Julien HENRY commented on an issue
Title: Message Title
Jigar Joshi commented on an issue
Title: Message Title
Jigar Joshi closed an issue as Not A Bug
Title: Message Title
Julien HENRY deleted an issue
Hi Dan,
Let's see if I understand you correctly here. Do you mean that:
1. Building AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7 (i.e. corresponding to svn
revision 19957) from source fails in one of the unit tests for you?
I have built the release from source checkouts on Mac OS X and Linux
several t
Build from source at SVN works for me.
It fails when i build using
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/1.7/aspectj-maven-plugin-1.7-source-release.zip
-D
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Lennart Jörelid
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Let's see if I un
I can't reproduce that error on Mac or Linux, Dan (using the same
maven/java specs as above).
Can you provide me with the surefire error log of your build run (or - even
better - a maven debug log) of the unit test in question so I can
understand what could cause it for you?
2014-09-11 0:39 GMT+0
I am not able to reproduce this issue any more on both windows and linux.
Not sure what is going on.
+1 from me.
-Dan
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Lennart Jörelid
wrote:
> I can't reproduce that error on Mac or Linux, Dan (using the same
> maven/java specs as above).
>
> Can you provide me
24 matches
Mail list logo
