[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-134) Warnings via are reported without file name and line number

2014-09-09 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-134) Warnings via are reported without file name and line number

2014-09-09 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-134) Warnings via are reported without file name and line number

2014-09-09 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Hi all, I'd like to release version 1.7 of the AspectJ Maven Plugin, which contains updates to the internal AspectJ toolset and several bug fixes. The AspectJ-Maven-Plugin weaves AspectJ aspects into your classes using the AspectJ compiler ("ajc"). We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/se

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread David Karlsen
+1 2014-09-09 18:23 GMT+02:00 Lennart Jörelid : > Hi all, > > I'd like to release version 1.7 of the AspectJ Maven Plugin, which > contains updates > to the internal AspectJ toolset and several bug fixes. > > The AspectJ-Maven-Plugin weaves AspectJ aspects into your classes > using the AspectJ co

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Folks - I would be really grateful if someone running a Windows box could perform a build of the A-M-P. I believe that we have fixed all OS-dependent issues regarding path definitions in the ITs, but it would be nice to verify this... :) And I give a +1, btw. 2014-09-09 18:37 GMT+02:00 David

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, first can you give the correct location to the staging repository cause i simply can't find it... I've checked. https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/releases/... https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/ Only 1.6 available but N

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Let's see here: a) The privileges in JIRA must have been altered since the last release - because I can't find the "Release" button in there. Anyone else who can't access the release button in JIRA? b) I'll spin a staging repo shortly; when I take a look I can't find it either. Weird. I'll re-spin

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Lennart, > Let's see here: a) The privileges in JIRA must have been altered since the last release - because I can't find the "Release" button in there. Anyone else who can't access the release button in JIRA? You need to see if you have Link "Administration" on the upper left corner righ

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MFINDBUGS-202) Plugin is not Java 5 compatible as advertised

2014-09-09 Thread Brandon Heck (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Brandon Heck created an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Robert Scholte
Current trunk runs fine on my system: Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 14:51:28+0100) Maven home: D:\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\.. Java version: 1.7.0_55, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_55\jre Default locale: nl_NL, plat

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Dan Tran
I see no sign of maven-release-plugin ran. Am I the only one? latest pom.xml still show 1.7-SNAPSHOT ( https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/pom.xml) -Dan On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Current trunk runs fine on my system: > Apache Maven 3.0.5

Re: [mojo-dev] The Tools.jar (or equivalent dependency)

2014-09-09 Thread Robert Scholte
Just quoting the ajdoc-ref[1] "ajdoc currently requires the tools.jar from J2SE 1.3 to be on the classpath. Normally the scripts set this up, assuming that your JAVA_HOME variable points to an appropriate installation of Java. You may need to provide this jar when using a different version

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Thanks; found it. Fixing the release as well. Posting a new release vote when done. 2014-09-09 20:00 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Lennart, > > > Let's see here: > >> >> a) The privileges in JIRA must have been altered since the last release >> - because I can't find the "Release" button

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2010) Add the M2E declaration in the plugin so that it works out of the box

2014-09-09 Thread Alejandro E (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Alejandro E commented on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Nice. Thanks, Robert. 2014-09-09 20:38 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > Current trunk runs fine on my system: > Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 > 14:51:28+0100) > Maven home: D:\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\.. > Java version: 1.7.0_55, vendor: Oracle Corporation >

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2010) Add the M2E declaration in the plugin so that it works out of the box

2014-09-09 Thread Alejandro E (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Alejandro E edited a comment on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] The Tools.jar (or equivalent dependency)

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
I believe that the error comes from the fact that there is nothing in the repo (pom/sha-1 or otherwise) for the maven GAV com.sun:tools:jar:1.7.0_65 It's weird since the dependency states a systemPath. I would expect maven to simply ignore the GAV resolution and use the file found at the systemPa

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
I have tried to perform the release for some time now, and it fails with [ERROR] Provider message: [ERROR] The svn command failed. [ERROR] Command output: [ERROR] svn: Commit failed (details follow): [ERROR] svn: access to '/mojo/!svn/act/4ff53956-aa6f-40d2-addd-7d1463164bbf' forbidden Despite my

Re[2]: [mojo-dev] The Tools.jar (or equivalent dependency)

2014-09-09 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Somehow I feel that we've got the wrong end of the stick here. I don't think invoking ajdoc in-process is the right thing to do, and it also defeats maven toolchains mechanism. I reckon the plugin should instead encapsulate some logic to build the classpath and detect where the tools.jar (or eq

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] The Tools.jar (or equivalent dependency)

2014-09-09 Thread Lennart Jörelid
I guess we could change the way we invoke the ajdoc if we feel there is a better way to do it. However, for creating a classpath containing the tools.jar there is a simple mechanism for this in maven - by using the systemPath property on a dependency. 2014-09-10 0:23 GMT+02:00 Sergei Ivanov : >

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-136) Misconfigured dependencyResolution in AjcReportMojo

2014-09-09 Thread Sergei Ivanov (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Sergei Ivanov created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-136) Misconfigured dependencyResolution in AjcReportMojo

2014-09-09 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid assigned an issue to Lennart Jörelid

Re[2]: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] The Tools.jar (or equivalent dependency)

2014-09-09 Thread Sergei Ivanov
What I mean is: let us get rid of system-scoped dependency completely, because it is unreliable and potentially disruptive. Let us introduce some logic in the code of the plugin itself to try an locate the tools.jar (or equivalent) using the configured java environment and then fork a new java

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MSQLJ-17) JDK8 support

2014-09-09 Thread Stefan Bohn (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Stefan Bohn commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MSQLJ-17) JDK8 support

2014-09-09 Thread Stefan Bohn (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Stefan Bohn commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MASPECTJ-136) Misconfigured dependencyResolution in AjcReportMojo

2014-09-09 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Lennart Jörelid closed an issue as Fixed

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSSION] Relax the procedure to push for 1.0

2014-09-09 Thread Brett Porter
I've traditionally done it when asked, but I'm not really tracking the project any more. It'd be good if someone could take over the responsibility. - Brett On 5 Sep 2014, at 8:21 pm, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Ben told me that officially it is Brett who is responsible to create Mojo > projects