[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-128) Plugin does not find EXE on customized toolchain path

Title: Message Title Markus KARG commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] Plexus Utils

Hi, by coincidence i found that the plexus-utils component had a new release about a month ago...3.0.17... https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5553 (see last comment)... So the question is: Why is the site not updated (http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils/ states 3.0.9) and why has been

Re: [mojo-dev] Plexus Utils

Hi, this question is also valid for http://modello.codehaus.org/index.html The site states 1.7 but Central 1.8.1 ? ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise > Hi, by coincidence i found that the plexus-utils component had a new release about a month ago...3.0.17... https://jira.codehaus.org/brows

Re: [mojo-dev] Plexus Utils

The maintenance of all Plexus projects have been moved to Sonatype. https://github.com/sonatype/modello/ https://github.com/sonatype/plexus-utils I have no idea if there's still site documentation available. Robert Op Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:16:14 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise : Hi, thi

[mojo-dev] NOTICE file in source tree

MJAXB-79 asks for LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source tree of jaxb-m-p. I don't see any other plugin having a NOTICE file. Should we have that at Mojo? /Anders

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-79) JAXB-2 Maven Plugin don't include the license file

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar assigned an issue to Anders Hammar

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-79) JAXB-2 Maven Plugin don't include the license file

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-79) JAXB-2 Maven Plugin don't include the license file

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-76) XmlRootElement annotation not added to root element class if it has a type that's defined in the same schema

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-75) additional schmema1.xsd is generated in the 2nd run

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] Planning a release of jaxb2-m-p next week

I'm planning a new release of the jaxb plugin in the coming week with an upgrade to jaxb v2.2 as the major theme (which also makes it work with JDK 8). If anyone wants to fix anything else, please do so. (Or provide good quality patches in jira and I can handle it.) /Anders

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-80) Schemagen has namespace prefix problem

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-27) Test for staleness doesns't handle deep tree files correctly

Title: Message Title Anders Hammar updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-128) Plugin does not find EXE on customized toolchain path

Title: Message Title Sergei Ivanov commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-128) Plugin does not find EXE on customized toolchain path

Title: Message Title Markus KARG commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-59) Difference between and is not documented

Title: Message Title Karl Heinz Marbaise updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-128) Plugin does not find EXE on customized toolchain path

Title: Message Title Karl Heinz Marbaise commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-128) Plugin does not find EXE on customized toolchain path

Title: Message Title Karl Heinz Marbaise edited a comment on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-76) XmlRootElement annotation not added to root element class if it has a type that's defined in the same schema

Title: Message Title Carlin Scott commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-229) Parent version during "use-releases"

Title: Message Title Alexandre Garnier updated an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] NOTICE file in source tree

plugins at apache maven has those files automated under MANIFEST, are we obligate to do so? -D On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Anders Hammar wrote: > MJAXB-79 asks for LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source tree of jaxb-m-p. > I don't see any other plugin having a NOTICE file. Should we have t