Hi Robert,
Am 13.03.2014 21:43, schrieb Robert Scholte:
Op Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:40:23 +0100 schreef Jörg Hohwiller
:
Hi there,
I added site documentation and some other missing infos. Further I fixed
some JavaDoc issues.
For clarification I found the following questions:
* Why do we copy sec
Op Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:40:23 +0100 schreef Jörg Hohwiller
:
Hi there,
I added site documentation and some other missing infos. Further I fixed
some JavaDoc issues.
For clarification I found the following questions:
* Why do we copy section of when we strip
from ? This appears inconsistent
Hi Jörg,
I've done this, although you have enough rights to do it yourself.
Give it a try the next time :)
Robert
Op Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:45:19 +0100 schreef Jörg Hohwiller
:
Hi Robert,
could you be so kind and build the current site? I need this for
promotion so everybody can quickly hav
Hi Robert,
could you be so kind and build the current site? I need this for
promotion so everybody can quickly have a look:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/promotevote-mailtemplate.html
Thanks
Jörg
Am 10.03.2014 21:09, schrieb Robert Scholte:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/proces
Hi there,
I added site documentation and some other missing infos. Further I fixed
some JavaDoc issues.
For clarification I found the following questions:
* Why do we copy section of when we strip
from ? This appears inconsistent to me.
* Shall we prevent creating "useless" profiles (those
http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/process.html#Versioning_and_Release_Strategy
In this case beta might be right (feature complete). There are already a
good number of ITs, there's a lot of javadoc.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/performing-a-release.html#Graduating_from_the_Sandbox
fo
Hi, just a quick thought about a detail. I saw you named it 1.0-beta-x.
Maybe first releasing an alpha-x for the very first version would be better.
Anyway, about voting, IIRC there's a vote to go out of sandbox before a
vote to release.
My 2 cents.
2014-03-09 23:16 GMT+01:00 Jörg Hohwiller :
>
