2010/1/13 Peter Lynch :
> Mark, I ran the apt plugin with java 5 and 6 on OSX with your changes and
> all works well - tests pass. I also tested it on my other project. No
> problems. The only caveat is I can't seem to reproduce the original bug
> reliably so have no way of knowing If I will ever s
Mark, I ran the apt plugin with java 5 and 6 on OSX with your changes and
all works well - tests pass. I also tested it on my other project. No
problems. The only caveat is I can't seem to reproduce the original bug
reliably so have no way of knowing If I will ever see the problem again. I
think yo
2010/1/11 Mark Hobson :
> Sure, for (1) we'd also need to change the tests to use CLASS_TREE
> instead of SOURCE_TREE, which does pass locally. I'll add a unit test
> to exercise the -s sourceOutputDirectory option in conjunction with
> SOURCE_TREE for (3).
>
> I'll continue with this in the morni
2010/1/11 Peter Lynch :
> Re 1, no. Just changing -s to -d fails 16 unit tests on my system - just
> confirmed. Keeping -s and -d pointing to same directory does work fine ( as
> in patch). It seems both must be set - or perhaps I am being fooled since
> just -s is working at the moment too - ugh.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Thanks for the info guys, just trying to understand what's happening here.
>
> I've just looked at the ant task [1] and the original bug [2] for
> adding apt to ant. Their discussion of the 'preprocessdir' parameter
> in the bug comments has
That matches my understanding. I also answers why I was having issues that
were fixed by adding -d, as I was only generating xml files, not any java
files.
mihobson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info guys, just trying to understand what's happening here.
>
> I've just looked at the ant task [1]
Thanks for the info guys, just trying to understand what's happening here.
I've just looked at the ant task [1] and the original bug [2] for
adding apt to ant. Their discussion of the 'preprocessdir' parameter
in the bug comments has clarified the somewhat confusing distinction
between -d and -s
Mark, here is what I know so far about this problem.
- only reproduced in Java 1.6, but not always
- happened on Mac OSX 10.5 and WinXP cygwin from two different people
- appears inconsistently
- when it appears, simply running the existing integration tests for the apt
plugin will reproduce the p
OS: Win XP + cygwin 1.5.25 (i think)
JVM: 1.6.0_14
Maven: 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 15:16:01-0400)
apt-maven-plugin checked out from
http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/apt-maven-plugin-1.0-alpha-3
mihobson wrote:
>
> Ryan, what environment were you using in that stack trace you posted?
> (OS,
Ryan, what environment were you using in that stack trace you posted?
(OS, JVM, Maven.)
Mark
2010/1/6 Mark Hobson :
> How strange, thanks for retrying Peter. I'd rather not apply a patch
> without it demonstrably fixing something as it just confuses the code.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
> 2010/1/6 Pe
How strange, thanks for retrying Peter. I'd rather not apply a patch
without it demonstrably fixing something as it just confuses the code.
Cheers,
Mark
2010/1/6 Peter Lynch :
> I just went back and tested 1.0-alpha-3 again on my project and for some
> reason it works fine without any changes.
I just went back and tested 1.0-alpha-3 again on my project and for some
reason it works fine without any changes. This is really weird. Although I
think the patch is harmless, I'll mark the issue as Closed, can't reproduce.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Hi Peter
Hi Peter,
Apologies for the late reply. I'm still unsure as to what problem
you're trying to fix here. Can you supply details on how to reproduce
it? I've been using this plugin successfully for a while now.
Cheers,
Mark
2009/12/17 Peter Lynch :
> Hi Mark, thanks for taking interest in my tr
Hi Mark, thanks for taking interest in my troubles.
See my updates to the issue with a new patch. If you run the tests with the
new patch applied then the changes get suitably exercised by the ITs.
Preferably you can run it on something other than OSX to verify.
Let me know if I can be of more he
Hi Peter,
I've never had a problem with apt generating resources in the wrong
directory. Can you attach an example test project to demonstrate the
problem here?
Cheers,
Mark
2009/12/17 Peter Lynch :
> Hi,
>
> I created jira http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1478 and provided the
> patch to
Hi,
I created jira http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1478 and provided the
patch to fix it.
I thought I'd post here asking if someone is able to apply the patch for me?
I tried irc first...
I am offering any help in this regard. Anything from applying the patch to
doing a release of apt-mave
16 matches
Mail list logo
