+1
Op Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:51:58 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus
:
Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a
formal vote.
That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to the
mojo's graveyard.
[ ] +1 : deprecate it
[ ] 0 : don't care
[ ] -1: don'
+1
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
> My +1
>
> Le 2 mars 2015 08:57, "Anders Hammar" a écrit :
>
>> +1
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Baptiste Mathus
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a
>>> formal
My +1
Le 2 mars 2015 08:57, "Anders Hammar" a écrit :
> +1
>
> /Anders
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Baptiste Mathus
> wrote:
>
>> Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a
>> formal vote.
>>
>> That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to
+1
/Anders
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Baptiste Mathus
wrote:
> Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a
> formal vote.
>
> That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to the
> mojo's graveyard.
>
> [ ] +1 : deprecate it
> [ ] 0 : don't care
Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a
formal vote.
That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to the
mojo's graveyard.
[ ] +1 : deprecate it
[ ] 0 : don't care
[ ] -1: don't move it, i think it's still useful
This vote will be open for at lea
