+1
2014-09-06 19:42 GMT+02:00 Jörg Hohwiller :
> Hi there,
>
> In order to change the license of the source-code of an open-source
> project the official procedure is that all authors that contributed
> (reasonable) to the code give their agreement (potentially by signature).
> This is especial
IANAL. I'm a little mystified by the motivations of your company's lawyers.
To me it seems like either
1. They want the ability to sue everyone else using this software while using
it themselves since someone else independently implemented a patent they hold.
(in which case the patent is perh
Hi there,
In order to change the license of the source-code of an open-source
project the official procedure is that all authors that contributed
(reasonable) to the code give their agreement (potentially by signature).
This is especially for larger projects a big procedure.
I personally see
Here is quote from our internal doc regarding apachev2
These licenses contain automatic patent licenses. Some specific
technologies have been reviewed and found to be free of undesired
impact on X's patent portfolio. X development organizations
are approved only to use the specific technol
Hi,
read http://www.codehaus.org/customs/licenses.html
The advice is to use ASL2, although MIT is permitted.
I want to hear the facts why "they say" MIT would be better.
Robert
Op Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:40:48 +0200 schreef Dan Tran :
OK, They are not my plugins, they belong to MOJO@codehaus
th
