Re[2]: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Minimum requirements for Mojo Plugins

2015-02-13 Thread Sergei Ivanov
Hi Lennart, 2. One alternative is to use release:prepare-with-pom instead of release:prepare in the process of releasing a plugin. This will generate a release-pom.xml file, which will be included into the final artifact and also checked into the tag. The release POM is a fully interpolated pr

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Minimum requirements for Mojo Plugins

2015-02-13 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Good to hear some opinions from you all. Time to throw some of my own into the mix. 1. Yes, I recommend that PlantUML be integrated for use to improve the documentation in all Codehaus and Apache plugins (and therefore included in their respective parent POMs). Why? In my experience,

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Minimum requirements for Mojo Plugins

2015-02-10 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:26:57 +0100 schreef Anders Hammar : I would recommend that we migrate to the following requirement for all our plugins: 1. Minimum Maven version 3.0.4 (i.e. drop support for Maven 2.x) As discussed (and concluded) somewhere else, we should go with a Maven 3.0

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Minimum requirements for Mojo Plugins

2015-02-10 Thread Anders Hammar
> > I would recommend that we migrate to the following requirement for all our > plugins: > >1. Minimum Maven version 3.0.4 (i.e. drop support for Maven 2.x) > > As discussed (and concluded) somewhere else, we should go with a Maven 3.0 minimum requirement. Unless there is a good technical reas

[mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Minimum requirements for Mojo Plugins

2015-02-05 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Hello all, I have just changed the IT structure for the Jaxb2-Maven-Plugin in Bamboo, in preparation for the release of version 2.0 which is a major plugin upgrade. The change on bamboo reflects a change in requirements for the plugin, and I believe we should approach this in a similar manner for