Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-21 Thread Anders Hammar
I've filed a HAUS ticket for the missing login link. /Anders (mobile) Den 21 apr 2014 23:12 skrev "Baptiste Mathus" : > FYI, just committed the associated modification in r19666. Now the IT run > in target/it as usually found. The CI still fails, but at least now I have > a BUILD SUCCESS locally.

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-21 Thread Baptiste Mathus
FYI, just committed the associated modification in r19666. Now the IT run in target/it as usually found. The CI still fails, but at least now I have a BUILD SUCCESS locally. If someone can confirm buildnumber-m-p 'mvn clean verify' now run correctly on their machine, that'd be great. About the CI

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-20 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Le 20 avr. 2014 13:09, "Stephen Connolly" a écrit : > > > > On Sunday, 20 April 2014, Robert Scholte wrote: >> >> Op Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:04:33 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise < khmarba...@gmx.de>: >> >>> Hi Baptiste, >>> >>> > Back to trying to keep going to be able to release as I said I woul

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Sunday, 20 April 2014, Robert Scholte wrote: > Op Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:04:33 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise < > khmarba...@gmx.de>: > > Hi Baptiste, >> >> > Back to trying to keep going to be able to release as I said I would, >> >>> I'm working on some jiras. >>> The thing is, I noticed I

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-20 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, >> Hm...i don't like that idea...You might start on a local branch to be sure you don't break something but i don't see as a strategy Please don't, just fix it properly. Nobody will look to an old setup if the new one is used. I wrote only on a local branch so just temporarily as he

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-20 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:04:33 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise : Hi Baptiste, > Back to trying to keep going to be able to release as I said I would, I'm working on some jiras. The thing is, I noticed I have 3 ITs that fail locally. They also fail in Bamboo (https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/b

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-19 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Baptiste, > Back to trying to keep going to be able to release as I said I would, I'm working on some jiras. The thing is, I noticed I have 3 ITs that fail locally. They also fail in Bamboo (https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-MBUILDNUM-45/log). The same here on my local machine

[mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Buildnumber-m-p IT failures & existing IT maintenance

2014-04-19 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Hi all, Back to trying to keep going to be able to release as I said I would, I'm working on some jiras. The thing is, I noticed I have 3 ITs that fail locally. They also fail in Bamboo (https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-MBUILDNUM-45/log). I think the issue with two of the ITs is about t