date:20140904

Here is quote from our internal doc regarding apachev2 These licenses contain automatic patent licenses. Some specific technologies have been reviewed and found to be free of undesired impact on X's patent portfolio. X development organizations are approved only to use the specific technol

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2042) flatten-maven-plugin: adds central repository to flattened POM

2014-09-04 Thread Sergei Ivanov (JIRA)

Title: Message Title Sergei Ivanov updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2042) flatten-maven-plugin: adds central repository to flattened POM

2014-09-04 Thread JIRA

Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2042) flatten-maven-plugin: adds central repository to flattened POM

2014-09-04 Thread JIRA

Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2042) flatten-maven-plugin: adds central repository to flattened POM

2014-09-04 Thread JIRA

Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller commented on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] verify.groovy going insane?

2014-09-04 Thread Jörg Hohwiller

Hi Robert, thanks for the hint. I always thought that the nice this about groovy is that a == b is the same as a null-safe a.equals(b). If I got it corrently what you are telling then it seems not to make any difference: [INFO] The post-build script did not succeed. assert 'no-one'.equals(

Re: [mojo-dev] verify.groovy going insane?

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte

Maybe the difference between String and GString[1] equals should always work Robert [1] http://groovy.codehaus.org/Strings+and+GString Op Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:59:54 +0200 schreef Jörg Hohwiller : Hi there, I am not a groovy expert and need some help. An IT of flatten-maven-plugin fails wit

[mojo-dev] verify.groovy going insane?

2014-09-04 Thread Jörg Hohwiller

Hi there, I am not a groovy expert and need some help. An IT of flatten-maven-plugin fails with this error: assert 'no-one' == flattendProject.repositories.repository.id | | || | | | || no-one

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [DISCUSSION] Relax the procedure to push for 1.0

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte

Hi, If you compare the differences between Apaches PMC and teammembers, then the difference between a Codehaus despot and teammember is much smaller. Teammembers already have a lot of rights for the infrastructure[1], there's no such thing as binding votes. Main difference between a despot

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSSION] Switching plugins to MIT license

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte

Hi, read http://www.codehaus.org/customs/licenses.html The advice is to use ASL2, although MIT is permitted. I want to hear the facts why "they say" MIT would be better. Robert Op Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:40:48 +0200 schreef Dan Tran : OK, They are not my plugins, they belong to MOJO@codehaus th

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte

Op Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:44:10 +0200 schreef Lennart Jörelid : I just noted, but adding a Max JDK version doesn't seem to make any sense in this case. The AspectJ compiler will generate bytecode compliant with a certain JDK version, implying that performing bytecode manipulation (i.e. calling

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release build-helper-maven-plugin 1.9.1

2014-09-04 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise

Hi Dan, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise On 9/3/14 4:59 AM, Dan Tran wrote: Hi, I'd like to release version 1.9.1 of the build-helper-maven-plugin. This plugin contains various small independent goals to assist with Maven build lifecycle. We solved 3 issues: _https://jira.codehau

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release build-helper-maven-plugin 1.9.1

2014-09-04 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen

+1 Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 1.9.1 of the build-helper-maven-plugin. >

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MAPPASM-237) Programs and daemons jvmSettings should add to rather than replace defaultJvmSettings

2014-09-04 Thread David Whitmarsh (JIRA)

Title: Message Title David Whitmarsh created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MSONAR-92) PITest results are removed if target/pit-reports is empty.

2014-09-04 Thread Martin Jeppesen (JIRA)

Title: Message Title Martin Jeppesen created an issue

41 matches

Mail list logo