Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSSION] Relax the procedure to push for 1.0

2014-09-02 Thread Anders Hammar
Not sure what you mean. Do you want to make a 1.0 release without a mojo specific JIRA project? /Anders On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > Currently in order for a component to become 1.0, it just have a Jira > project. So far we have a hard time getting depot to manage this pro

[mojo-dev] [DISCUSSION] Relax the procedure to push for 1.0

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
Currently in order for a component to become 1.0, it just have a Jira project. So far we have a hard time getting depot to manage this procedure. Could we just mangen it like the way Jenkins does with plugin? a component id is just good enough Thanks -Dan

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MNBMODULE-245) Dependency resolution for version ranges

2014-09-02 Thread Milos Kleint (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Milos Kleint commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MNBMODULE-245) Dependency resolution for version ranges

2014-09-02 Thread Jesse Glick (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Jesse Glick closed an issue as Won't Fix

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MNBMODULE-245) Dependency resolution for version ranges

2014-09-02 Thread Jesse Glick (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Jesse Glick assigned an issue to Unassigned

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release build-helper-maven-plugin 1.9.1

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
Hi, I'd like to release version 1.9.1 of the build-helper-maven-plugin. This plugin contains various small independent goals to assist with Maven build lifecycle. We solved 3 issues: *https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11702&version=20534

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-09-02 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller edited a comment on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2042) flatten-maven-plugin: adds central repository to flattened POM

2014-09-02 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-09-02 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-09-02 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-09-02 Thread JIRA
Title: Message Title Jörg Hohwiller commented on an issue

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Lennart Jörelid
If comes from the extra maven-enforcer-plugin rule that was added in the last checkin. I will take a look at this tomorrow and see if I can get everything to build properly. 2014-09-03 0:02 GMT+02:00 Dan Tran : > i meant, I am NOT able to build this plugin any more ( maven 3.2.3, java > 1.7.x)

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
i meant, I am NOT able to build this plugin any more ( maven 3.2.3, java 1.7.x) On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > btw, I am able to build this plugin any more ( maven 3.2.3, java 1.7.x) > > [INFO] Artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.7.0_55:system contains .class compiled > with incorre

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
btw, I am able to build this plugin any more ( maven 3.2.3, java 1.7.x) [INFO] Artifact com.sun:tools:jar:1.7.0_55:system contains .class compiled with incorrect version [INFO] Artifact org.aspectj:aspectjtools:jar:1.8.0:compile contains .class compiled with incorrect version [WARNING] Rule 0: org

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Lennart Jörelid
I just noted, but adding a Max JDK version doesn't seem to make any sense in this case. The AspectJ compiler will generate bytecode compliant with a certain JDK version, implying that performing bytecode manipulation (i.e. calling AJC) without that JDK version present will cause problems. Therefor

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I've added the enforceBytecodeVersion rule to see which jar(s) are causing problems. It seems that aspectjtools can't run with JDK5. As long as org.aspectj.tools.ajc.Main.Main() is called within the same JVM, we need to upgrade the JDK requirement. Otherwise we need to start a new JVM, p

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I've fixed the unittest, next step is to fix the integration tests. I've added a JDK8 task to the integration tests, so now it will be tested with the minimum (JDK5) and maximum, both with Maven-2.2.1. There are only linux bambooo-agents available right now. According to JIRA[1] there has

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
Hi Anders, Robert, Karl Are you able to help with this issue at bamboo setup? Thanks -D On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Lennart Jörelid wrote: > We need to set up a few projects in Bamboo where the aspectj_maven_plugin > is compiled using different kinds of JDKs. This is to validate that th

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Lennart Jörelid
We need to set up a few projects in Bamboo where the aspectj_maven_plugin is compiled using different kinds of JDKs. This is to validate that the AspectJ compiler options for the respective JDKs do not cause java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file at java.

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
what do we need from codehaus bamboo? Thanks -D On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Lennart Jörelid wrote: > No, we should not. > > https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-MASPECTJ > > Fails since we have been unable - thus far - to create a new project with > JDK 8 support. > If we could get

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Lennart Jörelid
No, we should not. https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-MASPECTJ Fails since we have been unable - thus far - to create a new project with JDK 8 support. If we could get that done, we would be one step closer to release. 2014-09-02 17:46 GMT+02:00 Dan Tran : > should we go ehead to push

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
should we go ehead to push this release out? Thanks -D On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Anders Hammar wrote: > I filed a ticket for this: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASPECTJ-135 > > Feel free to add more info as you see fit. > > /Anders > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Dan Tran

[mojo-dev] Releasing buildhelper 1.9.1

2014-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
I am going cut buildhelper 1.9.1 tonight US time, if have anything to push in i can wait Thanks -D

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Tom Mitchell (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Tom Mitchell commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-265) profiles ignored on set but not revert

2014-09-02 Thread Christopher Smith (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Christopher Smith created an issue